Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 22:9:711094.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.711094. eCollection 2022.

A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models

Riyam Mistry  1 , Mark Veres  2 , Fadi Issa  1
Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models

Riyam Mistry et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: A reproducible, standardised model for cutaneous scar tissue to assess therapeutics is crucial to the progress of the field. A systematic review was performed to critically evaluate scarring models in both animal and human research.

Method: All studies in which cutaneous scars are modelling in animals or humans were included. Models that were focused on the wound healing process or those in humans with scars from an existing injury were excluded. Ovid Medline® was searched on 25 February 2019 to perform two near identical searches; one aimed at animals and the other aimed at humans. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for study selection. Full texts of potentially suitable studies were then obtained for analysis.

Results: The animal kingdom search yielded 818 results, of which 71 were included in the review. Animals utilised included rabbits, mice, pigs, dogs and primates. Methods used for creating scar tissue included sharp excision, dermatome injury, thermal injury and injection of fibrotic substances. The search for scar assessment in humans yielded 287 results, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. In all human studies, sharp incision was used to create scar tissue. Some studies focused on patients before or after elective surgery, including bilateral breast reduction, knee replacement or midline sternotomy.

Discussion: The rabbit ear scar model was the most popular tool for scar research, although pigs produce scar tissue which most closely resembles that of humans. Immunodeficient mouse models allow for in vivo engraftment and study of human scar tissue, however, there are limitations relating to the systemic response to these xenografts. Factors that determine the use of animals include cost of housing requirements, genetic traceability, and ethical concerns. In humans, surgical patients are often studied for scarring responses and outcomes, but reproducibility and patient factors that impact healing can limit interpretation. Human tissue use in vitro may serve as a good basis to rapidly screen and assess treatments prior to clinical use, with the advantage of reduced cost and setup requirements.

Keywords: animals; human; research models; review; scarring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of records involved in analysis of animal scar models.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of records involved in analysis of human scar models.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rivera-Gonzalez GC, Morris SA. Tracing the origins of axolotl limb regeneration. Dev Cell. (2018) 47:675–7. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naldaiz-Gastesi N, Bahri OA, López de Munain A, McCullagh KJA, Izeta A. The panniculus carnosus muscle: an evolutionary enigma at the intersection of distinct research fields. J Anat. (2018) 233:275–88. 10.1111/joa.12840 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. (2001) 9:66–76. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindblad WJ. Considerations for selecting the correct animal model for dermal wound-healing studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. (2008) 19:1087–96. 10.1163/156856208784909390 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heinrich W, Lange PM, Stirtz T, Iancu C, Heidemann E. Isolation and characterization of the large cyanogen bromide peptides from the alpha1- and alpha2-chains of pig skin collagen. FEBS Lett. (1971) 16:63–7. 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80687-7 - DOI - PubMed