Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 13;9(44):25318-25325.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra04513a.

Novel vinyl-modified RGD conjugated silica nanoparticles based on photo click chemistry for in vivo prostate cancer targeted fluorescence imaging

Affiliations

Novel vinyl-modified RGD conjugated silica nanoparticles based on photo click chemistry for in vivo prostate cancer targeted fluorescence imaging

Hanrui Li et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Molecular imaging is a powerful tool for non-invasive visualization of tumors that plays an important role in their diagnosis and treatment. The specificity of molecular imaging probes for cancer cells is important for accurate tumor visualization, with antibody and polypeptide nanoprobe conjugates having often been used as targeting agents for tumor detection. However, many traditional chemical conjugation methods employ complex conjugation reactions that result in poor efficiency and poor bioactivity. Herein, we describe the use of photo click methodology for the rapid synthesis of nanoprobes comprised of silica nanoparticles functionalized with RGD targeting units (SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs) (∼80 nm) for in vivo prostate cancer fluorescent imaging applications. These SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs exhibit a maximum absorption wavelength of 380 nm in their UV absorption spectra with a maximum fluorescence emission wavelength of 550 nm. Confocal immunofluorescent imaging reveal that SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs exhibit excellent targeting ability for visualizing cancer cells, with in vivo fluorescence imaging intensity in a subcutaneous tumor model of prostate cancer reaching a maxima after 4 h. Biosafety assessments showed that SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs demonstrate no obvious toxicity in mice, thus demonstrated that these novel NPs may prove to be promising fluorescent imaging agents for the accurate detection and treatment of tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs. (A) Synthesis schematic of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs; (B) the photo click reaction between tetrazole compound T1 and RGD.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Characterization of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs. (A) TEM images of SiO2 NPs; (B) size distribution of SiO2 NPs determined through DLS; (C) UV absorption spectra of T1, SiO2 NPs, SiO2@T1 NPs and SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs; (D) UV absorption and fluorescence spectra of T1-RGDk.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (A) Confocal immunofluorescent images of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs showing their localization in PC-3 cells. (B) Confocal immunofluorescent images of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs showing their localization in PC-3 cells in the presence of RGD-Ack blocking agent. Cells stained with DAPI are colored blue. Cells containing SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs are colored red.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Cell viability of PC-3 cells incubated with different concentrations of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs, SiO2 NPs, T1 and RGD-Ack.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Acute toxicity results of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs in BALB/c mice; (A) survival rates of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs in BALB/c mice; (B) H&E staining of major organs (including heart, liver and kidneys) from mice 14 days after injected with SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs. Healthy mice treated with saline were used as control.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (A) In vivo fluorescent imaging of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs after 12 h. (B) Changes in fluorescent intensity of SiO2@T1-RGDk NPs that occur during in vivo imaging studies over time.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Fluorescent images of frozen tumor cross-sections, shown by good superposition of blue and green fluorescence signals that correspond to DAPI and dSiO2@T1-RGDk NPs, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre L. A. Bray F. Siegel R. L. Ferlay J. Lortet-Tieulent J. Jemal A. Ca–Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weissleder R. Pittet M. J. Nature. 2008;452:580–589. doi: 10.1038/nature06917. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li H. Li K. Dai Y. Xu X. Cao X. Zeng Q. He H. Pang L. Liang J. Chen X. Zhan Y. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2018;14:1867–1877. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owens E. A. Henary M. El Fakhri G. Choi H. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016;49:1731–1740. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miyata Y. Ishizawa T. Kamiya M. Yamashita S. Hasegawa K. Ushiku A. Shibahara J. Fukayama M. Urano Y. Kokudo N. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed