Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;64(2):218-234.
doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e16. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

Development of strategies to manufacture low-salt meat products - a review

Affiliations
Review

Development of strategies to manufacture low-salt meat products - a review

Gracia Henreita Suci Aprilia et al. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Urbanization is usually followed by changes in eating habits, with a specific trend toward the consumption of ready-to-eat products, such as processed foods. Among the latter, meat products are known contributors to high dietary sodium owing to salt addition. Salt plays an essential role in maintaining the quality of meat products in terms of acceptability and safety. However, an excessive salt intake is linked to high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases. Hence, several studies have been competing for the discovery of salt alternatives performing in a similar way as common salt. A number of replacements have been proposed to reduce salt consumption in meat products while taking into account consumer preferences. Unfortunately, these have resulted in poorer product quality, followed by new adverse effects on health. This review addresses these recent issues by illustrating some established approaches and providing insight into further challenges in developing low-salt meat products.

Keywords: Low-salt meat products; Low-sodium meat products; Meat products; Natural salt replacers; Salt alternatives; Salt modifying; Salt reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. The contribution of salt intake from food categories (%).
Adapted from Verma & Banerjee [14] with permission of Taylor & Francis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Salt roles in meat processing to improve the quality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gokirmakli C, Bayram M. Future of meat industry. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2017;5:232–8. doi: 10.15406/mojfpt.2017.05.00117. - DOI
    1. Ramachandraiah K, Han SG, Chin KB. Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications — a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015;28:290–302. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0607. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang J, Xiong YL. Natural antioxidants as food and feed additives to promote health benefits and quality of meat products: a review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:107–17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ. Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346:f1326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sych J, Kaelin I, Gerlach F, Wróbel A, Le T, FitzGerald R, et al. Intake of processed meat and association with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in a representative sample of the Swiss population. Nutrients. 2019;11:2556. doi: 10.3390/nu11112556. - DOI - PMC - PubMed