Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;29(4):1928-1935.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.037. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Potentials, prospects and applications of genome editing technologies in livestock production

Affiliations
Review

Potentials, prospects and applications of genome editing technologies in livestock production

Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza et al. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in genome editing applications using new programmable DNA nucleases such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like endonucleases (TALENs) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 system (CRISPR/Cas9). These genome editing tools are capable of nicking DNA precisely by targeting specific sequences, and enable the addition, removal or substitution of nucleotides via double-stranded breakage at specific genomic loci. CRISPR/Cas system, one of the most recent genome editing tools, affords the ability to efficiently generate multiple genomic nicks in single experiment. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas systems are relatively easy and cost effective when compared to other genome editing technologies. This is in part because CRISPR/Cas systems rely on RNA-DNA binding, unlike other genome editing tools that rely on protein-DNA interactions, which affords CRISPR/Cas systems higher flexibility and more fidelity. Genome editing tools have significantly contributed to different aspects of livestock production such as disease resistance, improved performance, alterations of milk composition, animal welfare and biomedicine. However, despite these contributions and future potential, genome editing technologies also have inherent risks, and therefore, ethics and social acceptance are crucial factors associated with implementation of these technologies. This review emphasizes the impact of genome editing technologies in development of livestock breeding and production in numerous species such as cattle, pigs, sheep and goats. This review also discusses the mechanisms behind genome editing technologies, their potential applications, risks and associated ethics that should be considered in the context of livestock.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; Genome editing; Livestock; Meganucleases; TALENs; ZFNs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nuclease-based genome editors. (A) Meganucleases, (B) ZFNs, (C) TALENs, (D) Diagram illustrate genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of major techniques. Somatic cell nuclear transfer, cytoplasmic microinjection, and electroporation for producing genome-edited livestock using gene editors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alberio R., Wolf E. 25th Anniversary of cloning by somatic-cell nuclear transfer: Nuclear transfer and the development of genetically modified/gene edited livestock. Reproduction. 2021;162:F59–F68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhaya D., Davison M., Barrangou R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011;45(1):273–297. - PubMed
    1. Bi Y., Hua Z., Liu X., Hua W., Ren H., Xiao H., Zhang L., Li L., Wang Z., Laible G., Wang Y., Dong F., Zheng X. Isozygous and selectable marker-free MSTN knockout cloned pigs generated by the combined use of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/LoxP. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boch J., Bonas U. Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010;48(1):419–436. - PubMed
    1. Bruce A. Genome edited animals: Learning from GM crops? Transgenic Research. 2017;26(3):385–398. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources