Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;79(2):1546-1558.
doi: 10.1111/biom.13689. Epub 2022 May 26.

Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard

Clara Drew  1 , Moses Badio  2   3 , Dehkontee Dennis  2 , Lisa Hensley  2   4 , Elizabeth Higgs  2   4 , Michael Sneller  5 , Mosoka Fallah  2   6 , Cavan Reilly  1   2
Affiliations

Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard

Clara Drew et al. Biometrics. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Many different methods for evaluating diagnostic test results in the absence of a gold standard have been proposed. In this paper, we discuss how one common method, a maximum likelihood estimate for a latent class model found via the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm can be applied to longitudinal data where test sensitivity changes over time. We also propose two simplified and nonparametric methods which use data-based indicator variables for disease status and compare their accuracy to the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) results. We find that with high specificity tests, the performance of simpler approximations may be just as high as the MLE.

Keywords: Ebola virus disease; diagnostic testing; latent class model; multiple testing; nongold-standard test; nonparametric model.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Albert, P.S. and Dodd, L.E. (2004) A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard. Biometrics, 60, 427-435.
    1. Albert, P.S., McShane, L.M., Shih, J.H. and The U.S. National Cancer Institute Bladder Tumor Marker Network, (2001) Latent class modeling approaches for assessing diagnostic error without a gold standard: with applications to p53 immunohistochemical assays in bladder tumors. Biometrics, 57, 610-619.
    1. Alonzo, T.A. and Pepe, M.S. (1999) Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2987-3003.
    1. Black, M.A. and Craig, B.A. (2002) Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2653-2669.
    1. Chikere, C.M.U., Wilson, K., Graziadio, S., Vale, L. and Allen, A.J. (2019) Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: a systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - an update. PLoS One, 14, 1-25.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources