Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;27(6):1076-1095.
doi: 10.1177/13634593221096241. Epub 2022 May 9.

Involuntary psychiatric treatment and the erosion of consent: A critical discourse analysis of mental health legislation in British Columbia, Canada

Affiliations

Involuntary psychiatric treatment and the erosion of consent: A critical discourse analysis of mental health legislation in British Columbia, Canada

Maja Kolar et al. Health (London). 2023 Nov.

Abstract

The Mental Health Act (1996) is legislation that directs voluntary and involuntary psychiatric treatment for people experiencing mental health issues in British Columbia (BC), Canada. This critical discursive analysis explores how BC's Mental Health Act (1996) and the Guide to the Mental Health Act (2005) structure involuntary psychiatric treatment and illustrates how the discourses within these texts constitute people experiencing mental health issues as passive recipients of care. Understandings of people experiencing mental health issues as pathological, incapable, vulnerable and dangerous justify their need for protection and the protection of others. Protection is identified as a central legitimising discourse in the use of involuntary psychiatric treatment. Further, these texts define the roles and responsibilities of police, physicians and nurses in authorising and implementing involuntary psychiatric treatment. This analysis describes how this legislation erodes consent and entrenches social marginalisation. Alternatively, discourses of equity have potential to transform health care practices and structures that reproduce discourses of deficit, vulnerability and dangerousness, shifting towards promotion of the rights and safety of people experiencing mental health issues and crises.

Keywords: consent; critical discourse analysis; involuntary psychiatric treatment; legislation; mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramowitz JS. (2015) The biomedical model: Caveat emptor. The Behavior Therapist 38(7): 169-171.
    1. Ahmadvand M. (2011) Critical discourse analysis: An introduction to major approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Bahasa dan Budaya 5(1): 82–90.
    1. American Psychiatric Association Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Backer E, Carten R, Emberley J, et al.. (2019) Vancouver mental health and addictions systems barrier report – 2018/2019. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Mental Health Association Vancouver-Fraser. Available at: https://vancouver-fraser.cmha.bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/cmha_barr... (accessed 1 April 2019).
    1. Boyd J, Kerr T. (2016) Policing ‘Vancouver’s mental health crisis’: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Public Health 26(4): 418–433. - PMC - PubMed