The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China
- PMID: 35532555
- PMCID: PMC9809478
- DOI: 10.4103/aja202220
The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the role of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in predicting prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men based on a large cohort of the Chinese population. From a prostate biopsy database between March 2017 and July 2021, we retrospectively identified 240 biopsy-naïve patients with negative prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 [PI-RADS v2] score <3). Logistic regression analysis was performed to select the potential predictors for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy. The negative predictive values of mpMRI in excluding any cancer and csPCa were 83.8% (201/240) and 90.8% (218/240), respectively. ROC curve analysis indicated that PSAD was the most promising predictor, with an AUC value of 0.786 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.699-0.874), and multiparametric logistic regression analysis confirmed that higher PSAD remained a significant marker for predicting csPCa (odds ratio [OR]: 10.99, 95% CI: 2.75-44.02, P < 0.001). Combining negative mpMRI and PSAD below 0.20 ng ml-2 obviously increased the predictive value in excluding PCa (91.0%, 101/111) or csPCa (100.0%, 111/111). If a PSAD below 0.20 ng ml-2 was set as the criterion to omit biopsy, nearly 46.3% of patients (463 per 1000) with negative mpMRI could safely avoid unnecessary biopsy, with approximately 4.2% of patients (42 per 1000) at risk of missed diagnosis of PCa and no patients with csPCa missed. A PI-RADS v2 score <3 and a PSAD <0.20 ng ml-2 could be potential criteria for the Chinese population to omit prompt biopsy safely.
Keywords: biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; predictive value; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen density; transrectal ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures


Similar articles
-
Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml-1 to 10 ng ml-1.Asian J Androl. 2023;25(4):492-498. doi: 10.4103/aja202288. Asian J Androl. 2023. PMID: 36571328 Free PMC article.
-
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31473884
-
Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Eur Urol Focus. 2024. PMID: 37865591
-
Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33358543
-
Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32444265
Cited by
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38551559 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factor analysis and optimal cutoff value selection of PSAD for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with negative mpMRI: results from a high-volume center in Southeast China.World J Surg Oncol. 2024 May 28;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03420-7. World J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38802859 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.Front Surg. 2024 Jul 16;11:1429831. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429831. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 39081487 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naïve Men.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Apr 22;64:1. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.04.001. eCollection 2024 Jun. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 38694877 Free PMC article.
-
Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml-1 to 10 ng ml-1.Asian J Androl. 2023;25(4):492-498. doi: 10.4103/aja202288. Asian J Androl. 2023. PMID: 36571328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2020;77:38–52. - PubMed
-
- Mottet N, van den Bergh RC, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1:screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62. - PubMed
-
- Pilatz A, Veeratterapillay R, Köves B, Cai T, Bartoletti R, et al. Update on strategies to reduce infectious complications after prostate biopsy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5:20–8. - PubMed
-
- Roberts MJ, Bennett HY, Harris PN, Holmes M, Grummet J, et al. Prostate biopsy-related infection:a systematic review of risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches. Urology. 2017;104:11–21. - PubMed
-
- Cicione A, De Nunzio C, Manno S, Damiano R, Posti A, et al. An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018;70:264–74. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous