Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;59(8):1019-1029.
doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01893-0. Epub 2022 May 9.

Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio on short- and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio on short- and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction

T Schmitz et al. Acta Diabetol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: Prior studies demonstrated an association between hospital admission blood glucose and mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been suggested as a more reliable marker of stress hyperglycemia this study investigated to what extent SHR in comparison with admission blood glucose is associated with short- and long-term mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic AMI patients.

Methods: The analysis was based on 2,311 AMI patients aged 25-84 years from the population-based Myocardial Infarction Registry Augsburg (median follow-up time 6.5 years [IQR: 4.9-8.1]). The SHR was calculated as admission glucose (mg/dl)/(28.7 × HbA1c (%)-46.7). Using logistic and COX regression analyses the associations between SHR and admission glucose and mortality were investigated.

Result: Higher admission glucose and higher SHR were significantly and nonlinearly associated with higher 28-day mortality in AMI patients with and without diabetes. In patients without diabetes, the AUC for SHR was significantly lower than for admission glucose (SHR: 0.6912 [95%CI 0.6317-0.7496], admission glucose: 0.716 [95%CI 0.6572-0.7736], p-value: 0.0351). In patients with diabetes the AUCs were similar for SHR and admission glucose. Increasing admission glucose and SHR were significantly nonlinearly associated with higher 5-year all-cause mortality in AMI patients with diabetes but not in non-diabetic patients. AUC values indicated a comparable prediction of 5-year mortality for both measures in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Conclusions: Stress hyperglycemia in AMI patients plays a significant role mainly with regard to short-term prognosis, but barely so for long-term prognosis, underlining the assumption that it is a transient dynamic disorder that occurs to varying degrees during the acute event, thereby affecting prognosis.

Keywords: Admission glucose; Long-term mortality; Myocardial infarction; Short-term mortality; Stress hyperglycemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart displaying all inclusions and exclusions of cases
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nonlinear associations between SHR and admission glucose levels and short-term mortality A as well as long-term mortality B, respectively. All models include an interaction term with diabetes and were adjusted for age, sex, typical chest pain symptoms, smoking, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, impaired renal function (according to GFR), PCI, bypass surgery, lysis therapy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A ROC curves for prediction of 28 day mortality (diabetes patients in the left, non-diabetes patients on the right). B ROC curves for prediction of 5-year mortality (diabetes patients in the left, non-diabetes patients on the right). P-values for the comparison of SHR and admission glucose are calculated by comparing the AUC values using bootstrapping
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A Forest plots display several odds ratio values of the adjusted logistic regression model for selected values for SHR and admission glucose (short-term mortality). B Display of Hazard ratio values of the adjusted COX regression models for selected values for SHR and admission glucose (long-term mortality)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Chou R, Snow V, Shekelle P. Use of intensive insulin therapy for the management of glycemic control in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:260–267. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-4-201102150-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC. Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet. 2000;355:773–778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08415-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wahab NN, Cowden EA, Pearce NJ, Gardner MJ, Merry H, Cox JL. Is blood glucose an independent predictor of mortality in acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1748–1754. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02483-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mizock BA. Alterations in fuel metabolism in critical illness: hyperglycaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;15:533–551. doi: 10.1053/beem.2001.0168. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D'Onofrio N, Sardu C, Paolisso P, et al. MicroRNA-33 and SIRT1 influence the coronary thrombus burden in hyperglycemic STEMI patients. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:1438–1452. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29064. - DOI - PubMed