Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May 9;24(5):e36943.
doi: 10.2196/36943.

Promised and Lottery Airtime Incentives to Improve Interactive Voice Response Survey Participation Among Adults in Bangladesh and Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial

Dustin Garrett Gibson  1 , Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria  1 , George William Pariyo  1 , Saifuddin Ahmed  1 , Joseph Ali  1 , Alain Bernard Labrique  1 , Iqbal Ansary Khan  2 , Elizeus Rutebemberwa  3 , Meerjady Sabrina Flora  2 , Adnan Ali Hyder  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Promised and Lottery Airtime Incentives to Improve Interactive Voice Response Survey Participation Among Adults in Bangladesh and Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial

Dustin Garrett Gibson et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Increased mobile phone penetration allows the interviewing of respondents using interactive voice response surveys in low- and middle-income countries. However, there has been little investigation of the best type of incentive to obtain data from a representative sample in these countries.

Objective: We assessed the effect of different airtime incentives options on cooperation and response rates of an interactive voice response survey in Bangladesh and Uganda.

Methods: The open-label randomized controlled trial had three arms: (1) no incentive (control), (2) promised airtime incentive of 50 Bangladeshi Taka (US $0.60; 1 BDT is approximately equivalent to US $0.012) or 5000 Ugandan Shilling (US $1.35; 1 UGX is approximately equivalent to US $0.00028), and (3) lottery incentive (500 BDT and 100,000 UGX), in which the odds of winning were 1:20. Fully automated random-digit dialing was used to sample eligible participants aged ≥18 years. The risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for primary outcomes of response and cooperation rates were obtained using log-binomial regression.

Results: Between June 14 and July 14, 2017, a total of 546,746 phone calls were made in Bangladesh, with 1165 complete interviews being conducted. Between March 26 and April 22, 2017, a total of 178,572 phone calls were made in Uganda, with 1248 complete interviews being conducted. Cooperation rates were significantly higher for the promised incentive (Bangladesh: 39.3%; RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.24-1.55, P<.001; Uganda: 59.9%; RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33-1.62, P<.001) and the lottery incentive arms (Bangladesh: 36.6%; RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15-1.45, P<.001; Uganda: 54.6%; RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21-1.48, P<.001) than those for the control arm (Bangladesh: 28.4%; Uganda: 40.9%). Similarly, response rates were significantly higher for the promised incentive (Bangladesh: 26.5%%; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39, P<.001; Uganda: 41.2%; RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.39, P<.001) and lottery incentive arms (Bangladesh: 24.5%%; RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.29, P=.002; Uganda: 37.9%%; RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.29, P=.001) than those for the control arm (Bangladesh: 21.0%; Uganda: 32.4%).

Conclusions: Promised or lottery airtime incentives improved survey participation and facilitated a large sample within a short period in 2 countries.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03773146; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03773146.

Keywords: Africa; Bangladesh; LMIC; RCT; Uganda; airtime incentive; communicable disease; cooperation; cooperation rate; incentive; interactive voice response; interactive voice response survey; lottery; low income; middle income; mobile phone survey; non-communicable disease; participation; randomized controlled trial; response rate; surveillance; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trial diagram of study participants in Bangladesh.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trial diagram of study participants in Uganda.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled risk ratios for cooperation and response rate by study arm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boutayeb A. The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Mar;100(3):191–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.07.021.S0035-9203(05)00317-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bygbjerg IC. Double burden of noncommunicable and infectious diseases in developing countries. Science. 2012 Sep 21;337(6101):1499–501. doi: 10.1126/science.1223466.337/6101/1499 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization Institutional Repository for Information Sharing. [2022-04-19]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148114/9789241564854_en... .
    1. Global Burden of Disease Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Br Dent J. 2015 Oct 9;219(7):329–329. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.751. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. World Health Organization. 2013. [2018-08-24]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506236 .

Publication types

Associated data