Hajibandeh Index versus NELA score in predicting mortality following emergency laparotomy: A retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 35533852
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106645
Hajibandeh Index versus NELA score in predicting mortality following emergency laparotomy: A retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare performance of the Hajibandeh Index (HI) and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) score in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
Methods: In compliance with STROCSS guidelines for observational studies a cohort study was conducted. All patients aged over 18 who underwent emergency laparotomy between January 2014 and January 2021 in our centre were considered eligible for inclusion. The HI and NELA indices in predicting 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality were compared. The discrimination of each test was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, classification using the classification table and calibration using a plotted diagram of the expected versus observed mortality rates.
Results: Analysis of 700 patients showed that the predictive performance of the HI and NELA models were comparable (30-day mortality: AUC: 0.86 vs 0.87, P = 0.557; 90-day mortality: AUC: 0.81 vs 0.84, P = 0.0607). In terms of 30-day mortality, HI was significantly better than the NELA model in predicting postoperative mortality in patients aged over 80 (AUC: 0.85 vs 0.72, P = 0.0174); however, the performances of both tools were comparable in patients with ASA status above 3 (AUC: 0.82 vs 0.82, P = 0.9775), patients with intraperitoneal contamination (AUC: 0.77 vs 0.85, P = 0.0728) and patients who needed a bowel resection (AUC: 0.85 vs 0.88, P = 0.2749). In terms of 90-day mortality, HI was significantly better than the NELA model in predicting mortality in patients aged over 80 (AUC: 0.82 vs 0.71, P = 0.0214); however, NELA had better predictive value in patients with intraperitoneal contamination (AUC: 0.76 vs 0.85, P = 0.0268); the performances of both tools were comparable in patients with ASA status above 3 (AUC: 0.77 vs 0.80, P = 0.2582), and patients who needed a bowel resection (AUC: 0.81 vs 0.86, P = 0.05). Both tools were comparable in terms of classification and calibration.
Conclusions: Hajibandeh index was better than the NELA score in predicting postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality in patients aged over 80 undergoing emergency laparotomy. Its performance in predicting 30-day and 90-day mortality was comparable with NELA score in other subgroups except 90-day mortality in patients with intraperitoneal contamination where the performance of NELA was better. We encourage other researchers to validate HI in predicting mortality following emergency laparotomy.
Keywords: Hajibandeh index; Laparotomy; Mortality; NELA.
Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictive Performance of NELA Versus P-POSSUM Mortality Scores: Are We Underestimating the Risk of Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy?Cureus. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32859. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36694527 Free PMC article.
-
HAS (Hajibandeh Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Status, and Sarcopenia) Model Versus NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) Score in Predicting the Risk of Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50180. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38077684 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of HAS (Hajibandeh Index, ASA Status, Sarcopenia) - A Novel Model for Predicting Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy.Ann Surg. 2024 Mar 1;279(3):501-509. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005897. Epub 2023 May 4. Ann Surg. 2024. PMID: 37139796
-
External validation of HAS model in predicting mortality after emergency laparotomy: a retrospective cohort study.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2025.0021. Online ahead of print. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025. PMID: 40178356 Review.
-
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Oct 31;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec. Surg Pract Sci. 2024. PMID: 39844951 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive Performance of NELA Versus P-POSSUM Mortality Scores: Are We Underestimating the Risk of Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy?Cureus. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32859. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36694527 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of P-POSSUM and NELA scores in predicting 30-day mortality following emergency laparotomy: A prospective observational study.Turk J Surg. 2025 Feb 27;41(1):56-60. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6645. Turk J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40012281 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between P-POSSUM and NELA risk score for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Egyptian patients.BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02189-y. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37735646 Free PMC article.
-
HAS (Hajibandeh Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Status, and Sarcopenia) Model Versus NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) Score in Predicting the Risk of Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50180. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38077684 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources