Sociodemographic differences in patient experience with primary care during COVID-19: results from a cross-sectional survey in Ontario, Canada
- PMID: 35534055
- PMCID: PMC9086266
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056868
Sociodemographic differences in patient experience with primary care during COVID-19: results from a cross-sectional survey in Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to understand patients' care-seeking behaviours early in the pandemic, their use and views of different virtual care modalities, and whether these differed by sociodemographic factors.
Methods: We conducted a multisite cross-sectional patient experience survey at 13 academic primary care teaching practices between May and June 2020. An anonymised link to an electronic survey was sent to a subset of patients with a valid email address on file; sampling was based on birth month. For each question, the proportion of respondents who selected each response was calculated, followed by a comparison by sociodemographic characteristics using χ2 tests.
Results: In total, 7532 participants responded to the survey. Most received care from their primary care clinic during the pandemic (67.7%, 5068/7482), the majority via phone (82.5%, 4195/5086). Among those who received care, 30.53% (1509/4943) stated that they delayed seeking care because of the pandemic. Most participants reported a high degree of comfort with phone (92.4%, 3824/4139), video (95.2%, 238/250) and email or messaging (91.3%, 794/870). However, those reporting difficulty making ends meet, poor or fair health and arriving in Canada in the last 10 years reported lower levels of comfort with virtual care and fewer wanted their practice to continue offering virtual options after the pandemic.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that newcomers, people living with a lower income and those reporting poor or fair health have a stronger preference and comfort for in-person primary care. Further research should explore potential barriers to virtual care and how these could be addressed.
Keywords: COVID-19; Health services administration & management; Primary Care; Quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Exploring the use and challenges of implementing virtual visits during COVID-19 in primary care and lessons for sustained use.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253665. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34166441 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e21240. doi: 10.2196/21240. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33427675 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for virtual care in primary care practices: a survey of patients across Ontario, Canada.Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(20 Suppl 1):2947. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2947. Ann Fam Med. 2022. PMID: 36706237 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Care and Clinical Parameters in a Primary Care Setting in Ontario, Canada: A Cross-sectional Study.Can J Diabetes. 2023 Jun;47(4):345-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Can J Diabetes. 2023. PMID: 36828737 Free PMC article.
-
The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.Fam Pract. 2021 Aug 27;38(Suppl 1):i30-i36. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab083. Fam Pract. 2021. PMID: 34448482 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Characteristics of walk-in clinic physicians and patients in Ontario: Cross-sectional study.Can Fam Physician. 2024 Oct;70(10):e156-e168. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7010e156. Can Fam Physician. 2024. PMID: 39406418 Free PMC article.
-
Influencing factors of patients' behavior of healthcare seeking: a meta-analysis in China.Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1583075. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1583075. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40356827 Free PMC article.
-
Examining experiences and system impacts of publicly funded episodic virtual care: protocol for a cross-provincial mixed methods study.BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 4;15(3):e099098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099098. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40037675 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the cost-of-living crisis on patient preferences towards virtual consultations.J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Sep;31(8):1175-1185. doi: 10.1177/1357633X241255411. Epub 2024 May 20. J Telemed Telecare. 2025. PMID: 38767152 Free PMC article.
-
Family physician practice patterns during COVID-19 and future intentions: Cross-sectional survey in Ontario, Canada.Can Fam Physician. 2022 Nov;68(11):836-846. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6811836. Can Fam Physician. 2022. PMID: 36376032 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Perry AF, Federico F, Huebner J. Telemedicine: Ensuring Safe, Equitable, Person-Centered Virtual Care. In: IHI white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2021.
-
- Bhatia RS, Shojania KG. Levinson WCost of contact: redesigning healthcare in the age of COVIDBMJ Quality & Safety 2021;30:236–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical