Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 May;63(3):251-261.
doi: 10.4111/icu.20210429.

Diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yan Jin et al. Investig Clin Urol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Purpose: A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutoff of 4 ng/mL has been widely used for prostate cancer screening in population-based settings. However, the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL cutoff in a hospital setting.

Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases until March 2020, and a meta-analysis and quality assessment were performed.

Results: A total of 11 studies were included at the completion of the screening process. The meta-analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.16 for a PSA cutoff below 4 ng/mL. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87, the positive likelihood ratio was 1.23, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.46, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 2.64. PSA sensitivities and specificities varied according to the cutoff range: 0.94 and 0.17 for 2 to 2.99 ng/mL, and 0.92 and 0.16 for 3 to 3.99 ng/mL, respectively. No significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of PSA cutoffs in the range of 2 to 2.99 ng/mL and 3 to 3.99 ng/mL were found.

Conclusions: Although a PSA cutoff <3 ng/mL is relatively more sensitive and specific than PSA ≥3 ng/mL, no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were found in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Therefore, clinicians should choose an appropriate PSA cutoff on the basis of clinical circumstances and patients' characteristics.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Prostate-specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow diagram for identification of eligible studies. P, patient; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; C, comparator; O, outcome.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (A, C, E) Coupled forest plots of pooled sensitivity and specificity of different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutoffs. Numbers are pooled estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) in parentheses. Corresponding heterogeneity statistics are provided at the bottom right corners. (B, D, F) Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve of the diagnostic performance of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Dodds KM, Coplen DE, Yuan JJ, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1156–1161. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1991;325:1324. - PubMed
    1. American Urological Association (AUA) Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. Oncology (Williston Park) 2000;14:267–272. 277–278, 280 passim. - PubMed
    1. Kim SH.KimS , Joung JY, Kwon WA, Seo HK, Chung J, et al. Lifestyle risk prediction model for prostate cancer in a Korean population. Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50:1194–1202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, Thompson IM, D'Amico AV, Volk RJ, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:70–98. - PubMed
    1. Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II-2020 update: treatment of relapsing and metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2021;79:263–282. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances