Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of adult-sized instruments in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35534382
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.04.014
Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of adult-sized instruments in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Little evidence exists regarding the benefits and disadvantages of adult-sized instruments for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in pediatric patients. This systematic review aims to clarify the safety and efficacy of this approach.
Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic literature review using databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included studies that evaluated PCNL in children. All identified records underwent two-phase title/abstract and full-text screening. Pediatric patients were defined as 17 years or younger, and adult-sized instruments as 24Fr and above. The primary outcomes were success (stone-free) rate and surgical complications obtained from studies comparing adult-sized and pediatric-sized instruments.
Results: A total of 84 abstracts and 16 full text article were assessed till July 2021 and 6 studies were included. All studies were retrospective. Number of accesses (Odds ratio (OR), adult-sized to pediatric-sized: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.52-1.78, p = 0.89), initial stone-free rate (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.42-1.27, p = 0.26), final stone-free rate (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.38-3.44, p = 0.82), and residual stones (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.42-1.49, p = 0.46) could be analyzed, none with significant differences. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly between the groups. However, one study reported more grade III/IV complications in the adult-sized instrument group. The adult-sized instrument group had a higher hemoglobin/hematocrit decrease in 3 studies. Duration of surgery, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, times to nephrostomy tube removal, and transfusion rate could not be assessed in meta-analysis; however, they were comparable between the adult-sized and pediatric-sized groups. Studies also showed that adult-sized instruments are applicable in children younger than 3 years and those with staghorn calculi as well as in fluoroscopy-free ultrasound-guided PCNL.
Conclusion: Adult-sized instruments had comparable outcomes to the pediatric-sized ones and can be applied in pediatric PCNL when factors such as accessibility justify their use. The number and design of the studies restrict the reliability of the comparisons. Therefore, future studies with improved methodology may better reveal the impact of instruments on the outcome of PCNL in children.
Keywords: Children; Nephrolithiasis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Surgical instrument.
Copyright © 2022 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest None.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. PMID: 38871548
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 23. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25064687
-
Validation of stone-kidney size score to predict outcome and complications of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1026-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Aug 5. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. PMID: 39153925
-
Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Feb 23. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28237786
-
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36161421 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources