Multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics and its treatment approach
- PMID: 35534749
- PMCID: PMC9160142
- DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03353-5
Multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics and its treatment approach
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in anti-myeloma treatments, early recurrence and death remain an issue in certain subpopulations. Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) are the most widely accepted predictors for poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM), such as t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain/amp(1q21), del(1p), and del(17p). Co-existing high-risk CAs (HRCAs) tend to be associated with an even worse prognosis. Achievement of sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity has recently emerged as a surrogate for longer survival, regardless of cytogenetic risk. Information from newer clinical trials suggests that extended intensified treatment can help achieve MRD-negativity in patients with HRCAs, which may lead to improved outcomes. Therapy should be considered to include a 3- or 4-drug induction regimen (PI/IMiD/Dex or PI/IMiD/Dex/anti-CD38 antibody), auto-transplantation, and consolidation/maintenance with lenalidomide ± a PI. Results from ongoing clinical trials for enriched high-risk populations will reveal the precise efficacy of the investigated regimens. Genetic abnormalities of MM cells are intrinsic critical factors determining tumor characteristics, which reflect the natural course and drug sensitivity of the disease. This paper reviews the clinicopathological features of genomic abnormalities related to adverse prognosis, focusing on HRCAs that are the most relevant in clinical practice, and outline current optimal therapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed MM with HRCAs.
Keywords: Multiple myeloma; del(17p); del(1p); gain/amp(1q21); t(14;16).
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The author received honoraria and/or membership on an entity's board of directors, speakers’ bureau, or advisory committees from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, Nihon-Shinyaku, Pfizer, AbbVie, Otsuka, Shionogi, Mundi, CSL Behring, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. The author received research funding from BMS, Ono, Kyowa Kirin, Sanofi, Takeda, and Celgene.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Clinical relevance of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and the second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) in patients with multiple myeloma in clinical practice.Int J Hematol. 2023 May;117(5):718-728. doi: 10.1007/s12185-023-03541-x. Epub 2023 Jan 24. Int J Hematol. 2023. PMID: 36692689
-
Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.Blood. 2016 Jun 16;127(24):2955-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200. Epub 2016 Mar 21. Blood. 2016. PMID: 27002115 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcome of Induction Treatment in the Era of Novel Agents and the Impact of the Number of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities (HRA) on Prognosis of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Insights From a Multicenter Study.Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70270. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70270. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39422477 Free PMC article.
-
Current Approach to Managing Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Apr;16(2):148-161. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00631-7. Epub 2021 Apr 19. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021. PMID: 33876390 Review.
-
Front-line therapies for elderly patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics in the era of novel agents.Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1267-1276. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0098-9. Epub 2018 Mar 28. Leukemia. 2018. PMID: 29720731 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Treosulfan and Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma.Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 10;15(10):2699. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102699. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37345036 Free PMC article.
-
Current State of Evidence on Definitions and Management of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar;27(3):258-277. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01639-5. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39937351 Review.
-
Individualized dynamic risk assessment and treatment selection for multiple myeloma.Br J Cancer. 2025 Jun;132(10):922-936. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-02987-6. Epub 2025 Apr 1. Br J Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40169765
-
The prognostic significance of ubiquitination-related genes in multiple myeloma by bioinformatics analysis.BMC Med Genomics. 2024 Jun 19;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12920-024-01937-0. BMC Med Genomics. 2024. PMID: 38898455 Free PMC article.
-
[Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)].Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 14;45(10):944-950. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240814-00303. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39622759 Free PMC article. Chinese.
References
-
- Fernández de Larrea C, Kyle R, Rosiñol L, Paiva B, Engelhardt M, Usmani S, et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):192. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00587-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous