Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;115(6):762-777.
doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03353-5. Epub 2022 May 9.

Multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics and its treatment approach

Affiliations
Review

Multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics and its treatment approach

Ichiro Hanamura. Int J Hematol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Despite substantial advances in anti-myeloma treatments, early recurrence and death remain an issue in certain subpopulations. Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) are the most widely accepted predictors for poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM), such as t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain/amp(1q21), del(1p), and del(17p). Co-existing high-risk CAs (HRCAs) tend to be associated with an even worse prognosis. Achievement of sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity has recently emerged as a surrogate for longer survival, regardless of cytogenetic risk. Information from newer clinical trials suggests that extended intensified treatment can help achieve MRD-negativity in patients with HRCAs, which may lead to improved outcomes. Therapy should be considered to include a 3- or 4-drug induction regimen (PI/IMiD/Dex or PI/IMiD/Dex/anti-CD38 antibody), auto-transplantation, and consolidation/maintenance with lenalidomide ± a PI. Results from ongoing clinical trials for enriched high-risk populations will reveal the precise efficacy of the investigated regimens. Genetic abnormalities of MM cells are intrinsic critical factors determining tumor characteristics, which reflect the natural course and drug sensitivity of the disease. This paper reviews the clinicopathological features of genomic abnormalities related to adverse prognosis, focusing on HRCAs that are the most relevant in clinical practice, and outline current optimal therapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed MM with HRCAs.

Keywords: Multiple myeloma; del(17p); del(1p); gain/amp(1q21); t(14;16).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author received honoraria and/or membership on an entity's board of directors, speakers’ bureau, or advisory committees from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, Nihon-Shinyaku, Pfizer, AbbVie, Otsuka, Shionogi, Mundi, CSL Behring, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. The author received research funding from BMS, Ono, Kyowa Kirin, Sanofi, Takeda, and Celgene.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment approach for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. MM multiple myeloma, ASCT autologous stem cell transplant, d dexamethasone, Dara daratumumab, FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization, K carfilzomib, R lenalidomide, V bortezomib, HRCA high-risk cytogenetic abnormality, MRD minimal residual disease
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of achievement of MRD-negativity (MRD, 10–5) by treatment phase and the number of HRCA in the MASTER trial. The negativity rates increased from post induction to consolidation in all subgroups [45]. MRD minimal residual disease, HRCA high-risk cytogenetic abnormality, ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(5):548–567. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25791. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S, Usmani S, Siegel D, Anderson KC, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2016;127(24):2955–2962. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie BGM, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–3420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Barlogie B, Smith TL, Alexanian R. High serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a marker for drug resistance and short survival in multiple myeloma. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):931–935. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernández de Larrea C, Kyle R, Rosiñol L, Paiva B, Engelhardt M, Usmani S, et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):192. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00587-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed