Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-1243.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059.

Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan

Affiliations

Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan

Prashila Dullabh et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a horizon scan to (1) identify challenges in patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and (2) identify future directions for PC CDS.

Materials and methods: We engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. We qualitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts, mapping findings to the 4 phases for translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors.

Results: We identified 12 challenges for PC CDS development. Lack of patient input was identified as a critical challenge. The key informants noted that patient input is critical to prioritizing topics for PC CDS and to ensuring that CDS aligns with patients' routine behaviors. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. We found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in our understanding of PC CDS' impact. Across all phases of CDS development, there is a lack of patient and provider trust and limited attention to patients' and providers' concerns.

Discussion: These challenges suggest opportunities for advancing PC CDS. There are opportunities to develop industry-wide practices and standards to increase transparency, standardize terminologies, and incorporate patient input. There is also opportunity to engage patients throughout the PC CDS research process to ensure that outcome measures are relevant to their needs.

Conclusion: Addressing these challenges and embracing these opportunities will help realize the promise of PC CDS-placing patients at the center of the healthcare system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient-centered factors for PC CDS. PC CDS exists on a continuum that reflects the degree to which its knowledge base, data, delivery, and use focus on patient needs and experiences. Abbreviations: PC CDS: patient-centered clinical decision support.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Published and gray literature search flow chart. We screened peer-reviewed and gray literature using prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Following screening, full-text review, and supplemental searches, we included 215 resources in our scoping review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, et al., eds. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020. 2020. https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ94/PLAW-116publ94.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2021.
    1. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008; 41 (2): 387–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patient-Centered and Patient-facing Clinical Decision Support | Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network. https://pccds-ln.org/node/276. Accessed August 2, 2021.
    1. Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Learning Network. https://pccds-ln.org/index.php/. Accessed August 2, 2021.

Publication types