Atrial mitral regurgitation: Characteristics and outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair
- PMID: 35535629
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30224
Atrial mitral regurgitation: Characteristics and outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair
Abstract
Background: Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) is an established therapeutic approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). Functional mitral regurgitation originating from atrial myopathy (A-FMR) has been described.
Objectives: We sought to assess the clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic considerations in A-FMR patients undergoing MTEER.
Methods: From 2014 to 2020, patients undergoing MTEER for degenerative MR (DMR), functional MR (FMR), and mixed MR were assessed. A-FMR was defined by the presence of MR > moderate in severity; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%; and severe left atrial (LA) enlargement in the absence of LV dysfunction, leaflet pathology, or LV tethering. The diagnosis of A-FMR (vs. ventricular-FMR [V-FMR]) was confirmed by three independent echocardiographers. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow-up are reported. Device success was defined as final MR grade ≤ moderate; MR reduction ≥1 grade; and final transmitral gradient <5 mmHg.
Results: 306 patients underwent MTEER, including DMR (62%), FMR (19%), and mixed MR (19%). FMR cases included 37 (63.8%) V-FMR and 21 (36.2%) A-FMR. Tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate) was higher in A-FMR (80.1%) compared to V-FMR (54%) and DMR (42%). Device success did not significantly differ between A-FMR and V-FMR (57% vs. 73%, p = 0.34) or DMR (57% vs. 64%, p = 1.0). The A-FMR cohort was less likely to achieve ≥3 grades of MR reduction compared to V-FMR (19% vs. 54%, p = 0.01) and DMR (19% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.01). Patients with V-FMR and DMR demonstrated significant reductions in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) and peak LA V-wave, though A-FMR did not (LAP -0.24 ± 4.9, p = 0.83; peak V-wave -1.76 ± 9.1, p = 0.39). In follow-up, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were similar.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing MTEER, A-FMR represents one-third of FMR cases. A-FMR demonstrates similar procedural success but blunted acute hemodynamic responses compared with DMR and V-FMR following MTEER. Dedicated studies specifically considering A-FMR are needed to discern the optimal therapeutic approaches.
Keywords: DMR; FMR; MitraClip; TEER; atrial MR.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Atrial functional mitral regurgitation: A cautionary tale?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul;100(1):143-144. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30307. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 35819151 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, et al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2307-2318.
-
- Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation: 5-year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2844-2854.
-
- El Sabbagh A, Reddy Yogesh NV, Nishimura Rick A. Mitral valve regurgitation in the contemporary era. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:628-643.
-
- Dziadzko V, Dziadzko M, Medina-Inojosa JR, et al. Causes and mechanisms of isolated mitral regurgitation in the community: clinical context and outcome. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2194-2202.
-
- Reddy Yogesh NV, Obokata M, Verbrugge Frederik H, Lin G, Borlaug Barry A. Atrial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1051-1064.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
