Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;9(4):2491-2499.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13951. Epub 2022 May 10.

Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Affiliations

Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Takayuki Gyoten et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: The removal of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after myocardial recovery can provide survival benefits with freedom from LVAD-associated complications. However, in the absence of standardization, the weaning evaluation and surgical strategy differ widely among centres. Therefore, we analysed the experiences of LVAD explantation with our protocol in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and investigated the validity of our weaning evaluation and surgical strategy from the perspective of optimal long-term survival.

Methods and results: All LVAD explantation patients in our institution between May 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by our three-phase weaning assessment: (i) clinical stability with improved cardiac function under LVAD support; (ii) haemodynamic stability shown by ramp-loading and saline-loading test; (iii) intraoperative pump-off test. Explant surgery involved removal of the whole system including driveline, pump, sewing ring and outflow-graft, and closure of an apical hole. Intra-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative outcomes, including all-cause mortality and LVAD associated major complications, were retrospectively analysed. A total of 12 DCM patients (DuraHeart, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 6; HeartMate 3, n = 2) had myocardial recovery after a median 10 months [interquartile range (IQR); 6.3-15 months] support and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 37 y, IQR; 34-41 years; 83% men]. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% (IQR; 12-23%) at LVAD-implantation and 54% (IQR: 45-55%) before LVAD explantation (P < 0.001). There were no perioperative complications and median ICU stay was 4 days (IQR; 2-4 days). All patients were discharged after a median of 24 days (IQR: 17-28 days) postoperatively. No patient suffered from any cardiac event (heart failure hospitalization, re-implantation of LVAD, or heart transplantation) at a median of 40 months (IQR: 17-58 months) follow up. All patients are alive with NYHA functional class 1 with preserved left ventricular function.

Conclusions: The evaluation of LVAD explant candidates by our weaning protocol was safe and effective. In the patients completing our protocol successfully, LVAD explantation is feasible and an excellent long-term cardiac event free-survival seems to be achieved.

Keywords: Heart failure; LVAD explantation; Left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support; Weaning protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest in context with this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weaning protocol sequence. BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CI, cardiac index; CVP, central venous pressure; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; LVDd, left ventricular diastolic diameter; mPCWP, mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; mRAP, mean right atrium pressure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival after LVAD explantation. Kaplan–Meier curves for freedom from al cause mortality, showing 100% survival rate at 1 year after LVAD explantation. All patient survived at median 3 years (IQR; 1–4 years) follow‐up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gummert JF, Haverich A, Schmitto JD, Potapov E, Schramm R, Falk V. Permanent implantable cardiac support systems. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019; 116: 843–848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schramm R, Morshuis M, Schoenbrodt M, Boergermann J, Hakim‐Meibodi K, Hata M, Gummert JF. Current perspectives on mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 55: i31–i37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wever‐Pinzon O, Drakos SG, McKellar SH, Home BD, Caine WT, Horne BD, Kfoury AG, Li DY, Fang JC, Stehlik J, Selzman CH. Cardiac recovery during long‐term left ventricular assist device support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1540–1553. - PubMed
    1. Pan S, Aksut B, Wever‐Pinzon OE, Rao SD, Levin AP, Garan AR, Fried JA, Takeda K, Hiroo T, Yuzefpolskaya M, Uriel N, Jorde UP, Mancini DM, Naka Y, Colombo PC, Topkara VK. Incidence and predictors of myocardial recovery on long‐term left ventricular assist device support: Results from the united network for organ sharing database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 34: 1624–1629. - PubMed
    1. Hall JL, Fermin DR, Birks EJ, Barton PJ, Slaughter M, Eckman P, Baba HA, Wohlschlaeger J, Miller LW. Clinical, molecular, and genomic changes in response to a left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 641–652. - PMC - PubMed