Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 10;18(2):613-625.
doi: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0071. eCollection 2022 Nov 1.

A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome

Affiliations

A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome

Sybil Prince Nelson et al. Int J Biostat. .

Abstract

Dichotomization is often used on clinical and diagnostic settings to simplify interpretation. For example, a person with systolic and diastolic blood pressure above 140 over 90 may be prescribed medication. Blood pressure as well as other factors such as age and cholesterol and their interactions may lead to increased risk of certain diseases. When using a dichotomized variable to determine a diagnosis, if the interactions with other variables are not considered, then an incorrect threshold for the continuous variable may be selected. In this paper, we compare single dichotomization with joint dichotomization; the process of simultaneously optimizing cutpoints for multiple variables. A simulation study shows that simultaneous dichotomization of continuous variables is more accurate in recovering both 'true' thresholds given they exist.

Keywords: Youden’s; cutpoints; dichotomization; disease prediction; odds ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Values of statistics from Table 2 for different thresholds, tx1; for X1 under single or joint thresholding in the case where two continuous variables X1 and X2 are associated with a binary outcome Y the relationship in the Equation 2. Here X~N20,I2,PX1T1>0.2,PX2T2>0.2,PY=1=0.2, PYT=0.2, and PYF=0.094. The solid line represents the value of each statistic for values of tx1 in [-4,4] under joint thresholding where tx2=T2. The dashed line represents the values of each statistic for values of tx1 under single thresholding. The vertical line occurs at the true threshold T1 for X1.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Numeric estimation of the first derivative of the six statistics from Table 2 for different values of threshold, tx1 for continuous variable X1 under single or joint dichotomization. Here PX1T1=0.2,PX2T2=0.2,PY=1=0.2 and OR=3. Under joint dichotomization we assume that tx1 varies while tx2=T2
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
The results from the simulation study comparing joint and single dichotomization of independent continuous variables. Each plot shows MSE by bias squared for the different values of PX1T1 and PX2T2 and strength of association with Y.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
The results from the simulation study comparing joint and single dichotomization of interacting continuous variables. Each plot shows MSE by bias squared for the different values of PX1T1 and PX2T2 and strength of association with Y.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aoki K, Misumi J, Kimura T, Zhao W, Xie T, “Evaluation of Cutoff Levels for Screening of Gastric Cancer Using Serum Pepsinogens and Distributions of Levels of Serum Pepsinogen I, II and of PG I / PG II Ratios in a Gastric Cancer Case-Control Study”, Journal of Epidemiology volume 7, number 3, pages 143–151, (1997), DOI: 10.2188/jea.7.143 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benjamin O, Lappin SL “End-Stage Renal Disease”, StatPearls[Internet], 2021. Sep 16. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan–. - PubMed
    1. Boehning D, Holling H, Patilea V, “ A limitation of the diagnostic-odds ratio in determining an optimal cut-off value for a continuous diagnostic test”, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, volume 20, number 5, pages 541–550, (2011) - PubMed
    1. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA, “ Classification and regression trees”, CRC press; (1984)
    1. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith R.D.t, “ Principles and practical application of the receiver operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests”, Preventive Veterinary Medicine volume 45, pages 23–41, (2000) - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources