Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct:71:154054.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154054. Epub 2022 May 7.

Clinicians' views on the use of triggers for specialist palliative care in the ICU: A qualitative secondary analysis

Komal Patel Murali  1 , Laura D Fonseca  2 , Craig D Blinderman  3 , Douglas B White  4 , May Hua  5
Affiliations

Clinicians' views on the use of triggers for specialist palliative care in the ICU: A qualitative secondary analysis

Komal Patel Murali et al. J Crit Care. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To understand clinicians' views regarding use of clinical criteria, or triggers, for specialist palliative care consultation in the ICU.

Materials and methods: Secondary analysis of a qualitative study that explored factors associated with adoption of specialist palliative care in the ICU. Semi-structured interviews with 36 ICU and palliative care clinicians included questions related to triggers for specialist palliative care. We performed a thematic analysis to identify participants' views on use of triggers, including appropriateness of cases for specialists and issues surrounding trigger implementation.

Results: We identified five major themes: 1) Appropriate triggers for specialist palliative care, 2) Issues leading to clinician ambivalence for triggers, 3) Prospective buy-in of stakeholders, 4) Workflow considerations in deploying a trigger system, and 5) Role of ICU clinicians in approving specialist palliative care consults. Appropriate triggers included end-of-life care, chronic critical illness, frequent ICU admissions, and patient/family support. Most clinicians had concerns about "trigger overload" and ICU clinicians wanted to be broadly involved in implementation efforts.

Conclusions: ICU and palliative care clinicians identified important issues to consider when implementing triggers for specialist palliative care consultation. Future research is needed to longitudinally examine the most appropriate triggers and best practices for trigger implementation.

Keywords: Critical care; Implementation science; Palliative care; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, et al. Association between palliative care and patient and caregiver outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016; 316(20):2104–14. 10.1001/jama.2016.16840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across United States intensive care units using a trigger-based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(4):428–36. 10.1164/rccm.201307-1229oc. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C, et al. Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the ICU: a report from the improving palliative care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) advisory board. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2318–27. Accessed Dec 8, 2020. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf12c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hua M, Lu Y, Ma X, Morrison RS, Li G, Wunsch H. Association between the implementation of hospital-based palliative care and use of intensive care during terminal hospitalizations. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1918675 Accessed Feb 23, 2021. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18675. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hua MS, Ma X, Li G, Wunsch H. Derivation of data-driven triggers for palliative care consultation in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2018;46:79–83. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types