Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 31:23:627-652.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-120621-090239. Epub 2022 May 10.

Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives

Raquel E Fleskes et al. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. .

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the study of ancient genomes from Ancestral humans, or human paleogenomic research, has expanded rapidly in both scale and scope. Ethical discourse has subsequently emerged to address issues of social responsibility and scientific robusticity in conducting research. Here, we highlight and contextualize the primary sources of professional ethical guidance aimed at paleogenomic researchers. We describe the tension among existing guidelines, while addressing core issues such as consent, destructive research methods, and data access and management. Currently, there is a dissonance between guidelines that focus on scientific outcomes and those that hold scientists accountable to stakeholder communities,such as descendants. Thus, we provide additional tools to navigate the complexities of ancient DNA research while centering engagement with stakeholder communities in the scientific process.

Keywords: Indigenous; ancient DNA; consent; ethics; paleogenomics; stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

K.S.T. serves as a noncompensated board member of the Native BioData Consortium, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) Indigenous biobank initiative in the United States. A.C.B. and K.G.C. are co–principal investigators and J.K.W., K.S.T., and N.A.G. are consultants on National Science Foundation grant 1922419. J.K.W. and N.A.G. are former members of the American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues committee. J.K.W. was a member and A.C.B. was a fellow of the American Association of Biological Anthropologists Ethics Committee.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ethical ethos for paleogenomic research. Three main stakeholder groups—Ancestors, descendant communities, and other stakeholders (i.e., nondescendant communities, researchers, and institutions such as museums)—are positioned as central to the research process, with verbs identifying researchers’ primary relationship to them. The actions “collaborating with descendant communities” and “respecting Ancestors” occupy proportional space to each other but hold greater weight than “engaging other stakeholders” to reflect how researchers might balance the diverse values of these different communities. Two questions at the core guide researchers to think about the ethics of research methods and outcomes. These questions are surrounded by an outer circle containing themes that enhance ethical paleogenomic research practices: upholding community research capacity, supporting data sovereignty, co-interpreting and contextualizing research findings, and communicating research implications. Additional research questions to guide researchers and community stakeholders in obtaining a deeper understanding of these concepts are listed in the adjacent boxes. Together, the figure and accompanying questions encourage researchers to engage each stakeholder community throughout the research process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Anthony D, Babiker H, Bánffy E, Booth T, et al. 2021. Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines. Nature 599:41–46 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010. After Havasupai litigation, Native Americans wary of genetic research. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152A:ix - PubMed
    1. Anagnostou P, Capocasa M, Milia N, Sanna E, Battaggia C, et al. 2015. When data sharing gets close to 100%: what human paleogenetics can teach the open science movement. PLOS ONE 10:e0121409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbour L, Cook D. 2006. DNA on loan: issues to consider when carrying out genetic research with aboriginal families and communities. J. Commun. Genet 9:153–60 - PubMed
    1. Atalay S. 2006. Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. Am. Indian Q 30:280–310

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources