COMPARE LAAO: Rationale and design of the randomized controlled trial "COMPARing Effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion to standard of care for atrial fibrillation patients at high stroke risk and ineligible to use oral anticoagulation therapy"
- PMID: 35537503
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.001
COMPARE LAAO: Rationale and design of the randomized controlled trial "COMPARing Effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion to standard of care for atrial fibrillation patients at high stroke risk and ineligible to use oral anticoagulation therapy"
Abstract
Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with a long-term or permanent contraindication for OAC randomized controlled trial (RCT) data is lacking.
Study objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of LAAO in AF patients who are ineligible to use OAC. The co-primary efficacy endpoint is (1) time to first occurrence of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or undetermined) and (2) time to first occurrence of the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE). The primary safety endpoint is the 30-day rate of peri-procedural complications.
Study design: This is a multicenter, investigator-initiated, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE), superiority-driven RCT. Patients with AF, a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 for men and ≥3 for women and a long-term or permanent contraindication for OAC will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to the device- or control arm. Patients in the device arm will undergo percutaneous LAAO and will receive post-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) per protocol, while those in the control arm will continue their current treatment consisting of no antithrombotic therapy or (D)APT as deemed appropriate by the primary responsible physician. In this endpoint-driven trial design, assuming a 50% lower stroke risk of LAAO compared to conservative treatment, 609 patients will be followed for a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 5 years. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses will be performed to allow decision-making on reimbursement of LAAO for the target population in the Netherlands.
Summary: The COMPARE LAAO trial will investigate the clinical superiority in preventing thromboembolic events and cost-effectiveness of LAAO in AF patients with a high thromboembolic risk and a contraindication for OAC use.
Nct trial number: NCT04676880.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Left atrial appendage occlusion vs novel oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicenter randomized occlusion-AF trial.Am Heart J. 2022 Jan;243:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Sep 17. Am Heart J. 2022. PMID: 34537184 Clinical Trial.
-
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to compare two antithrombotic strategies after left atrial appendage occlusion: double antiplatelet therapy vs. apixaban (ADALA study).J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;59(2):471-477. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00884-x. Epub 2020 Sep 28. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32986176 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation.Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 31;43(13):1348-1356. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab847. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 34919652 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical follow-up of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation ineligible of oral anticoagulation treatment-a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):215-225. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00953-9. Epub 2021 Feb 13. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33580847 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: A review of current devices, clinical evidence, patient selection, and post procedural antithrombotic management.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 May-Jun;66:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.006. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 34332665 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-Pharmacological Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 25;12(17):5524. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175524. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37685589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Left atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation: shaping the future of stroke prevention.Future Cardiol. 2025 May;21(6):391-404. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2484964. Epub 2025 Mar 26. Future Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40136040 Review.
-
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Decade of Experience.Drugs Aging. 2024 Sep;41(9):725-740. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01138-5. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Drugs Aging. 2024. PMID: 39141209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variations in the Medical Device Authorization and Reimbursement Landscape: A Case Study of 2 Cardiovascular Devices Across 4 Countries.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Apr;18(4):e011636. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011636. Epub 2025 Feb 21. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025. PMID: 39981570
-
Incidence and predictors of 2-year mortality following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in the EWOLUTION trial.Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae188. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae188. Europace. 2024. PMID: 39082730 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical