Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 10;12(5):e061475.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061475.

How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review

Affiliations

How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review

Michael J Lukacs et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: This protocol describes the methods for a mixed study systematic review aiming to explore the definitions and measurements of recovery in patients with low back pain, and how perspectives of recovery differ between patients and providers. This review will be the first to review the concept of recovery in patients with low back pain across both quantitative and qualitative literature.

Methods and analysis: This protocol has been designed and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. The following databases will be electronically searched from database inception until 30 November 2021: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro. Grey literature will be searched for through targeted searching of ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and handsearching of the references of all included studies. Studies will be included if they include a patient population of >50% with low back pain (with or without leg pain), and mention the concept of recovery within the abstract, methods or results. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used for quality assessment of both quantitative and qualitative included studies. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, screen titles/abstracts and extract relevant data from full texts. Discrepancies between reviewers will be settled by a third reviewer with spinal pain expertise. For syntheses, thematic analysis will be used to analyse both qualitative and quantitative investigations to explore meanings, measurement and perspectives of recovery from a diverse evidence base. There is no clinical trial associated with this protocol.

Ethics and dissemination: There are no ethical issues associated with this systematic review, and ethics approval was not required. Once completed, the results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal within the realm of spinal pain to help guide future research inquiries.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022295804.

Keywords: Low back pain; mixed study systematic review; recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Adamowicz JL, Caikauskaite I, Friedberg F. Defining recovery in chronic fatigue syndrome: a critical review. Qual Life Res 2014;23:2407–16. 10.1007/s11136-014-0705-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts G, Wolfson P. The rediscovery of recovery: open to all. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2004;10:37–48. 10.1192/apt.10.1.37 - DOI
    1. Borrell-Vega J, Humeidan ML, Bergese SD. Defining quality of recovery – what is important to patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2018;32:259–68. 10.1016/j.bpa.2018.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiles R, Cott C, Gibson BE. Hope, expectations and recovery from illness: a narrative synthesis of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2008;64:564–73. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04815.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellison ML, Belanger LK, Niles BL, et al. Explication and definition of mental health recovery: a systematic review. Adm Policy Ment Health 2018;45:91–102. 10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources