The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: a population-based study
- PMID: 35538165
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04171-1
The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: a population-based study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate and predictors for AL following minimally invasive restorative rectal resection (RRR) among rectal cancer patients managed according to up-to-date standardized treatment. Furthermore, we explored the impact of symptomatic AL on long-term survival.
Methods: The study cohort was rectal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive RRR in Central Denmark Region between 2013 and 2017. Data was retrieved from a prospective clinical quality database and supplemented with data from medical records. The AL rate was calculated as the proportion of patients who developed symptomatic AL within 30 days. Predictors for AL were identified through logistic regression. The impact of AL on long-term survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression.
Results: AL occurred in 15.1% of 604 patients. The AL rate for males was 20.1% (95% CI 16.3-24.3) and 5.0% (95% CI 2.4-9.0) for females. Odds ratio (OR) of AL in females vs. males was 0.25 (95% CI 0.12-0.51). The use of at least three firings when transecting the rectum was associated with OR of 2.71 (95% CI 1.17-6.26) for AL. The 5-year survival for patients with vs. those without AL was 76.1% (95%CI 65.1-84.0) and 83.6% (95%CI 79.8-86.7), corresponding to adjusted hazard ratio of 1.43 (95%CI 0.84-2.41).
Conclusion: Symptomatic AL is still a challenge in a standardized setting using minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer patients undergoing RRR, especially in men. Multiple firings should be avoided in transection of the rectum with an endoscopic stapler. AL had a statistical non-significant negative impact on survival.
Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Long-term survival; Multiple firings; Rectal cancer; Risk factors.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7. Epub 2020 May 25. Tech Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32451807
-
Anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection: treatment and impact on stoma presence 1 year after surgery-a population-based study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 May;37(5):1161-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04164-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 35469107
-
Minimally invasive approaches to the management of anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection.Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;21(12):1364-1371. doi: 10.1111/codi.14742. Epub 2019 Jul 17. Colorectal Dis. 2019. PMID: 31254432
-
Higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and multiple stapler firings for rectal transection are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer.Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 22;66(1):10-16. doi: 10.5387/fms.2019-17. Epub 2020 Feb 18. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32074522 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1208-2. World J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28764707 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and their impact on perioperative recovery: a retrospective study of 1082 patients.Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6782-6792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11149-3. Epub 2024 Aug 19. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39160312
-
Improving Performance and Access to Difficult-to-Reach Anatomy with a Powered Articulating Stapler.Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Sep 2;15:329-339. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S379717. eCollection 2022. Med Devices (Auckl). 2022. PMID: 36082377 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study.BMC Surg. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 36229822 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Aug 10;38(1):211. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04506-6. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023. PMID: 37561203
-
[Modern approaches and technologies to prevent anastomotic leakage in the gastrointestinal tract].Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;95(11):895-900. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02179-7. Epub 2024 Sep 28. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 39341921 German.
References
-
- Jørgensen JB, Erichsen R, Pedersen BG, Laurberg S, Iversen LH (2020) Stoma reversal after intended restorative rectal cancer resection in Denmark: nationwide population-based study. BJS Open 4(6):1162–1171 - DOI
-
- Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2035–2051 - DOI
-
- Kverneng Hultberg D, Svensson J, Jutesten H, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Lydrup M-L et al (2020) The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term function after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 63(5):619–628 - DOI
-
- Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, Putter H, Påahlman L, Folkesson J et al (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources