Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 6;8(11):5848-5853.
doi: 10.1039/c7ra12740e. eCollection 2018 Feb 2.

High rate capability by sulfur-doping into LiFePO4 matrix

Affiliations

High rate capability by sulfur-doping into LiFePO4 matrix

K Okada et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Enhanced electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 for Li-ion batteries has been anticipated by anion doping at the O-site rather than cation doping at the Fe-site. We report on the electrochemical performance of S-doped LiFePO4 nanoparticles synthesized by a solvothermal method using thioacetamide as a sulfur source. S-doping into the LiFePO4 matrix expands the lattice due to the larger ionic radius of S2- than that of O2-. The lattice parameters a and b increase by around 0.2% with sulfur content, while that of c remains almost unchanged with only 0.03% increase. The S-doping also contributes to the suppression of antisite defects (Fe occupying Li sites), which facilitates the easy migration of Li in the diffusion channels without blockage. Owing to these effects of S-doping, the S-doped LiFePO4 nanoparticles show enhanced electrochemical properties with a high discharge capacity of ∼113 mA h g-1 even at a high rate of 10C.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns of LFP and LFP-S-x (where x = 0.02, 0.07, 0.11, 0.22, 0.44 or 0.67) (silicon was used as a standard). (b) Changes in a and c lattice parameters of LFP-S-x (x: from 0 to 0.67).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. SEM images of LFP (a), LFP-S-0.22 (b) and LFP-S-0.67 (c and d).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Secondary electron image (SEI), EDS mapping images and line scan profile of LFP-S-0.22 for P, O, Fe and S. The line scan profile was collected in the red dot line of the SEI image.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. XPS spectra for the S 2p (a) and P 2p (b) electrons of LFP, LFP-S-0.22 and LFP-S-0.67.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) Charge–discharge voltage curves of LFP and LFP-S-0.22 at 5C. (b) Rate performance of LFP and LFP-S-0.22.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. FTIR spectra of LFP and LFP-S-0.22.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armand M. Tarascon J.-M. Nature. 2008;451:652. doi: 10.1038/451652a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunn B. Kamath H. Tarascon J.-M. Science. 2011;334:928. doi: 10.1126/science.1212741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eftekhari A. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017;5:2799. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00046. - DOI
    1. Islam M. S. Fisher C. A. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:185. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60199D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Etacheri V. Marom R. Elazari R. Salitra G. Aurbach D. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:3243.