Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 22;8(34):18771-18775.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra00464a.

Supramolecular hydrogels encapsulating bioengineered mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic therapy

Affiliations

Supramolecular hydrogels encapsulating bioengineered mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic therapy

Byung Woo Hwang et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

We developed supramolecular hyaluronate (HA) hydrogels to encapsulate genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of limb ischemia. In vivo angiogenic factors could be produced stably by the bioengineered MSCs (BMSCs) within the supramolecular hydrogels showing effective vascular repair and enhanced blood perfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration for (A) sequential synthesis of mCB[6]-HA using mono-amine CB[6] and the preparation of mCB[6]/DAH hydrogels, and (B) in vivo tests using BMSCs with the analysis by LDI to investigate ischemic limb reperfusion. Black arrows indicate the ligation point for hind limb surgery.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. 1H NMR analysis for (A) mCB[6], the formation of its inclusion with spermine, and (B) mCB[6]-HA.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (A) Genetic modification of MSCs using recombinant adenoviral (rAd) vectors in the presence of Fe3+ ions to express VEGF-A and HGF. (B) VEGF-A expression levels and (C) HGF expression levels of BMSCs (1 × 105 cells per mL) without and with the mCB[6]/DAH–HA hydrogels on PET membrane transwell inserts (mesh size = 8 μm) for specified periods over 2 weeks (mean ± SD, n = 3, *P < 0.0001).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) analysis for the blood reperfusion of BALB/c ischemic limb model mice after injection of BMSCs/HGF in various carriers. (A) Representative LDI images for peripheral blood flow in groups of mice that received media only (G1), BMSC/HGF in media (G2), in matrixen (G3), and in CB[6]/DAH–HA hydrogel (G4) at day 0, 2, 10, 18 and 24. The color-coded image shows the blood flow distribution. The low or no perfusion is shown in blue and the highest perfusion is shown in red. (B) The quantitative analysis of blood flow in hind limbs expressed as the perfusion ratio of ischemic hind limb to the untreated opposite limb (n = 5, **P < 0.01 vs. the control of G1). (C) The number of animals categorized in 3 groups as fully recovered, necrotized and amputated limbs at day 24 post-injection.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) analysis for the blood reperfusion of BALB/c ischemic limb model mice after injection of various BMSCs in mCB[6]/DAH–HA hydrogels. (A) Representative LDI images for peripheral blood flow in groups of mice that received the intact MSC (G1), BMSC/VEGF-A (G2), BMSC/HGF (G3), and BMSC/HGF + VEGF-A (G4) within mCB[6]/DAH–HA hydrogels at day 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28 post-injection. The color-coded image shows blood flow distribution as in Fig. 4(B). (B) The quantitative analysis of blood flow in hind limbs expressed as the perfusion ratio of ischemic hind limb to the untreated opposite limb (n = 6–7, ***P < 0.001 vs. the control of G1). (C) The number of animals categorized in 3 groups as fully recovered, necrotized and amputated limbs at day 28 post-injection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dua A. Lee C. J. Tech Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;19:91–95. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2016.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shammas N. W. Vasc. Health Risk Manage. 2007;3:229–234. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2007.3.2.229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rouwkema J. Khademhosseini A. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bussolino F. Di Renzo M. F. Ziche M. Bocchietto E. Olivero M. Naldini L. Gaudino G. Tamagnone L. Coffer A. Comoglio P. M. Di Renzo M. F. Ziche M. Bocchietto E. Olivero M. Naldini L. Gaudino G. Tamagnone L. Coffer A. Comoglio P. M. Di Renzo M. F. Ziche M. Bocchietto E. Olivero M. Naldini L. Gaudino G. Tamagnone L. Coffer A. Comoglio P. M. J. Cell Biol. 1992;119:629–641. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.629. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sulpice E. Ding S. Muscatelli-Groux B. Bergé M. Han Z. C. Plouet J. Tobelem G. Merkulova-Rainon T. Biol. Cell. 2009;101:525–539. doi: 10.1042/BC20080221. - DOI - PubMed