Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 18;8(45):25719-25724.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra04356f. eCollection 2018 Jul 16.

Xyloplains A-F, six new guaiane-type sesquiterpenoid dimers from Xylopia vielana

Affiliations

Xyloplains A-F, six new guaiane-type sesquiterpenoid dimers from Xylopia vielana

Yang-Guo Xie et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Six new guaiane dimers, xyloplains A-F (1-6), with connecting patterns through two direct C-C bonds (C-1 to C-3', C-2 to C-1'), were isolated from the roots of Xylopia vielana. Their structures were elucidated clearly using extensive analysis of 1D NMR and 2D NMR, combined with Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction and circular dichroism (CD) experiments. In additon, all of the isolates were tested for anti-inflammatory activity by measuring the amount of nitric oxide produced. To our delight, compounds 2 and 6 exhibited moderate inhibitory activity against the production of nitric oxide with IC50 value of 34.5 and 31.1 μM, respectively, in RAW264.7 cells stimulated by LPS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of compounds 1–6.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Key HMBC, 1H–1H COSY and NOESY correlations of 1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. X-ray structure of 1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. CD spectrum of compounds 1–4.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Key NOESY and 1H–1H COSY correlations of 4.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Key NOESY correlations of 5.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. X-ray structure of 5.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Key NOESY and 1H–1H COSY correlations of 6.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. The dose inhibition curves of nitric oxide produced by compounds 2 and 6. The data were obtained from three independent experiments and expressed as the means ± SEM.

Similar articles

References

    1. Martins D. Osshiro E. Roque N. F. Marks V. Gottlieb H. E. Phytochemistry. 1998;48:677–680. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)01048-0. - DOI
    1. Kamperdick C. Phuong N. M. Adam G. Van Sung T. Phytochemistry. 2001;56:335–340. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00344-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asekun O. T. Adeniyi B. A. Fitoterapia. 2004;75:368–370. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2003.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferraz R. P. C. Cardoso G. M. B. da Silva T. B. Fontes J. E. d. N. Prata A. P. d. N. Carvalho A. A. Moraes M. O. Pessoa C. Costa E. V. Bezerra D. P. Food Chem. 2013;141:196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohammed A. Islam M. S. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;96:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.116. - DOI - PubMed