Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 5;20(5):e07293.
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7293. eCollection 2022 May.

Assessment of the genotoxicity of acrylamide

Assessment of the genotoxicity of acrylamide

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

EFSA was requested to deliver a statement on a recent publication revisiting the evidence for genotoxicity of acrylamide (AA). The statement was prepared by a Working Group and was endorsed by the CONTAM Panel before its final approval. In interpreting the Terms of Reference, the statement considered the modes of action underlying the carcinogenicity of AA including genotoxic and non-genotoxic effects. Relevant publications since the 2015 CONTAM Panel Opinion on AA in food were reviewed. Several new studies reported positive results on the clastogenic and mutagenic properties of AA and its active metabolite glycidamide (GA). DNA adducts of GA were induced by AA exposure in experimental animals and have also been observed in humans. In addition to the genotoxicity of AA, there is evidence for both secondary DNA oxidation via generation of reactive oxygen species and for non-genotoxic effects which may contribute to carcinogenesis by AA. These studies extend the information assessed by the CONTAM Panel in its 2015 Opinion, and support its conclusions. That Opinion applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach, as recommended in the EFSA Guidance for substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic, for risk characterisation of the neoplastic effects of AA. Based on the new data evaluated, the MOE approach is still considered appropriate, and an update of the 2015 Opinion is not required at the present time.

Keywords: Acrylamide; DNA adducts; food; genotoxicity; glycidamide; modes of action.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexandrov LB, Kim J, Haradhvala NJ, Huang MN, Tian Ng AW, Wu Y, Boot A, Covington KR, Gordenin DA, Bergstrom EN, Islam SMA, Lopez-Bigas N, Klimczak LJ, McPherson JR, Morganella S, Sabarinathan R, Wheeler DA, Mustonen V, PCAWG Mutational Signatures Working Group, Getz G, Rozen SG, Stratton MR and PCAWG Consortium, 2020. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature, 578, 94–101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Algarni AA, 2018. Genotoxic effects of acrylamide in mouse bone marrow cells. Caryologia, 71, 160–165.
    1. Ankaiah R, Kurrey N and Krishnan MH, 2018. The positive intervention effects of resveratrol on acrylamide‐induced cyto‐/genotoxicity in primary lymphocytes of rat. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 14, S643–S648.
    1. Ansar S, Siddiqi NJ, Zargar S, Ganaie MA and Abudawood M, 2016. Hepatoprotective effect of Quercetin supplementation against Acrylamide‐induced DNA damage in Wistar rats. Bmc Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aras D, Cakar Z, Ozkavukcu S, Can A and Cinar O, 2017. In Vivo acrylamide exposure may cause severe toxicity to mouse oocytes through its metabolite glycidamide. PLoS One, 12. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources