A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk
- PMID: 3554150
A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to describe the protocol by which predictive instruments can be tested for validity and to evaluate the usefulness of an instrument for predicting pressure sore risk in an AICU. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk was described. Methods for measuring predictive validity and for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and per cent predictive value of positive and negative tests were discussed. Sixty consecutively admitted AICU patients who were pressure sore free were rated for pressure sore risk within 24 to 72 hours after admission. The skin condition of each patient was systematically assessed every 2 days. Twenty-four subjects developed pressure sores during the study period. The critical cut-off point at which the patient could be judged to be at risk for pressure sore formation was a Braden Scale score equal to or less than 16. The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at this score were 83 to 64 per cent, respectively. The per cent predictive value of a positive and negative test were 61 and 85 per cent, respectively. The Braden Scale compared favorably with the Norton Scale in respect to sensitivity. The specificity, or the tendency of a scale to overpredict, was greater for the Norton than for the Braden Scale. The Norton Scale overpredicted by 64 per cent, whereas the Braden Scale overpredicted by 36 per cent. This difference may be important clinically if all patients who were judged to be at risk received additional nursing care or protective devices. A greater number of patients may receive unnecessary and expensive treatments using the Norton Scale.
Similar articles
-
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001. Appl Nurs Res. 2005. PMID: 15991112
-
Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):42-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2006.00198.x. Nurs Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17883663
-
The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):205-10. Nurs Res. 1987. PMID: 3299278
-
A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools.J Clin Nurs. 1995 May;4(3):153-9. J Clin Nurs. 1995. PMID: 7773524 Review.
-
How to try this: predicting pressure ulcer risk. Using the Braden scale with hospitalized older adults: the evidence supports it.Am J Nurs. 2007 Nov;107(11):40-8; quiz 48-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000298058.25564.8a. Am J Nurs. 2007. PMID: 18075340 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Physiotherapy applied to palliative care patients: a descriptive practice-based study.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 20;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01188-3. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37474943 Free PMC article.
-
Pressure sores.BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):853-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.853. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 7950617 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Medicine in the elderly.Postgrad Med J. 1991 May;67(787):423-45. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.67.787.423. Postgrad Med J. 1991. PMID: 1852662 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Significance of Friction and Shear in the Prevention of Contemporary Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e2099. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002099. eCollection 2019 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019. PMID: 31321159 Free PMC article.
-
The Nursing Home Severity Index and Application to Pressure Injury Risk: Measure Development and Validation Study.JMIR Aging. 2023 Feb 9;6:e43130. doi: 10.2196/43130. JMIR Aging. 2023. PMID: 36757779 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical