Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 21;8(20):11157-11162.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra00926k. eCollection 2018 Mar 16.

Authentication of pork in meat mixtures using PRM mass spectrometry of myosin peptides

Affiliations

Authentication of pork in meat mixtures using PRM mass spectrometry of myosin peptides

Xiao-Dong Pan et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Adulteration of meat products is a major concern not only for economic fraud, but also for ethical reasons. In this study, we presented a parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mass spectrometry approach for detection of trace pork in meat mixtures (chicken, sheep, and beef). Specific peptides were identified and screened by a shotgun proteomic approach based on tryptic digests of certain protein. Five surrogate peptides from myosin were screened and then used for pork detection by PRM of Orbitrap MS. When the most sensitive peptide was selected, the LOD in mixed meat can be up to 0.5%. The RSD values between detected and designated pork levels (1%, 5% and 50%) were 4-15%. The targeted method developed can be applied to identify and quantify the pork in meat mixture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The workflow of pork authentication in meat mixtures.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The response of peptides to heating at 100 °C for different times ((1) HKYEETQAELEASQK; (2) KLETDISQIQGEMEDIVQEAR; (3) LETDISQIQGEMEDIVQEAR; (4) KLETDISQIQGEMEDIIQEAR; (5) LETDISQIQGEMEDIIQEAR).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The chromatogram of surrogated peptides and their mass spectra of fragments (5% pork meat mixture).

References

    1. Danezis G. P. Tsagkaris A. S. Camin F. Brusic V. Georgiou C. A. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2016;85:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.02.026. - DOI
    1. Vlachos A. Arvanitoyannis I. S. Tserkezou P. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;56:1061–1096. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.691573. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Bargen C. Brockmeyer J. Humpf H. U. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:9428–9435. doi: 10.1021/jf503468t. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sentandreu M. A. Sentandreu E. Food Res. Int. 2014;60:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.030. - DOI
    1. Ortea I. O'Connor G. Maquet A. J. Proteomics. 2016;147:212–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.06.033. - DOI - PubMed