Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 May 2;6(3):zrac065.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac065.

The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis

Xujia Li  1 , Haomin Lin  1 , Lin Zhu  1 , Jing Chen  1 , Sujuan Lei  1 , Bo Li  1 , Song Su  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis

Xujia Li et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. The effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing infection of the surgical sites is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness of a wound edge protector (WEP) in reducing SSI rates after abdominal surgery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to obtain relevant articles published up to September 2021. Publications were retrieved if they contain primary data on the use of WEPs in reducing SSI compared with standard care in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed for different WEP types, surgical sites, and levels of contamination. The outcome of interest was a clinically defined SSI. Qualitative variables were pooled using risk ratios (RRs).

Results: Twenty-two eligible randomized clinical trials involving 4492 patients were included in this meta-analysis. WEP was associated with the reduced incidence of overall SSI (RR = 0.66; 95 per cent c.i. 0.53 to 0.83; P = 0.0003), and superficial SSI (RR = 0.59; 95 per cent c.i. 0.38 to 0.91; P = 0.02). In addition, WEP also successfully reduced the risk of SSI in clean-contaminated wounds (RR = 0.61; 95 per cent c.i. 0.40 to 0.93; P = 0.02) as well as in contaminated wounds (RR = 0.47; 95 per cent c.i. 0.33 to 0.67; P < 0.0001); however, WEP did not reduce SSI incidence in colorectal surgery (RR = 0.68; 95 per cent c.i. 0.46 to 1.01; P = 0.05).

Conclusion: This study suggests that WEP was efficient in reducing superficial SSI. Both double-ringed and single-ringed devices were efficient in reducing SSI. WEP was effective in reducing SSI incidence in clean-contaminated and contaminated surgery; however, its use does not reduce the SSI rate in colorectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of literature search and selections
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias of included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Funnel plot of the included RCTs comparing WEPs with control (RevMan 5.3 output)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots for overall rate of surgical site infection
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plots for different degrees of SSI
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plots for SSI in different types of WEPs
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plots for SSI in different abdominal surgery sites
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plots for SSI in different degrees of contamination
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections 1992. A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608 - PubMed
    1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–332 - PubMed
    1. Barie PS, Wilson SE. Impact of evolving epidemiology on treatments for complicated skin and skin structure infections: the surgical perspective. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:105–116.e6 - PubMed
    1. WHO . Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018 - PubMed
    1. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Hummel RP. Surgical considerations of endogenous infections–sources, types, and methods of control. Surg Clin North Am 1968;48:227–240 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms