Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;395(8):867-885.
doi: 10.1007/s00210-022-02250-2. Epub 2022 May 11.

A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021

Affiliations
Review

A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021

Gizem Kayki-Mutlu et al. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2022 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

The second year of the COVID-19 pandemic had no adverse effect on the number of new drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Quite the contrary, with a total of 50 new drugs, 2021 belongs to the most successful FDA years. We assign these new drugs to one of three levels of innovation: (1) first drug against a condition ("first-in-indication"), (2) first drug using a novel molecular mechanism ("first-in-class"), and (3) "next-in-class", i.e., a drug using an already exploited molecular mechanism. We identify 21 first-in-class, 28 next-in-class, and only one first-in-indication drugs. By treatment area, the largest group is once again cancer drugs, many of which target specific genetic alterations. Every second drug approved in 2021 targets an orphan disease, half of them being cancers. Small molecules continue to dominate new drug approvals, followed by antibodies and non-antibody biopharmaceuticals. In 2021, the FDA continued to approve drugs without strong evidence of clinical effects, best exemplified by the aducanumab controversy.

Keywords: FDA; First-in-class; First-in-indication; New drugs; Next-in-class.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GKM, ZSA and LW decleare no conflict of interest. MCM is a consultant and/or speaker for Apogepha, Astellas, Dr. Willmar Schwabe, GSK and Sanofi-Aventis.

References

    1. Abyadeh M, Gupta V, Gupta V, Chitranshi N, Wu Y, Amirkhani A, Meyfour A, Sheriff S, Shen T, Dhiman K, Ghasem HS, Paul AH, Stuart LG, Mirzaei M. Comparative analysis of aducanumab, zagotenemab and pioglitazone as targeted treatment strategies for Alzheimer's disease. Aging Dis. 2021;12:1964–1976. doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.0719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal R, Kolkhof P, Bakris G, Bauersachs J, Haller H, Wada T, Zannad F. Steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in cardiorenal medicine. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:152–161. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong PW, Pieske B, Anstrom KJ, Ezekowitz J, Hernandez AF, Butler J, Lam CSP, Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Jia G, McNulty SE, Patel MJ, Roessig L, Koglin J, O'Connor CM. Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1883–1893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arya Y, Syal A, Gupta M, Gaba S. Advances in the treatment of polycythemia vera: trends in disease management. Cureus. 2021;13:e14193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atwal PS, Scaglia F. Molybdenum cofactor deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2016;117:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.11.010. - DOI - PubMed