Increased Reach and Effectiveness With a Low-Burden Point-of-Care Tobacco Treatment Program in Cancer Clinics
- PMID: 35545172
- PMCID: PMC9173433
- DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7333
Increased Reach and Effectiveness With a Low-Burden Point-of-Care Tobacco Treatment Program in Cancer Clinics
Abstract
Background: Tobacco cessation after a cancer diagnosis can extend patient survival by improving outcomes for primary cancer and preventing secondary cancers. However, smoking is often unaddressed in cancer care, highlighting the need for strategies to increase treatment reach and cessation. This study examined a low-burden, point-of-care tobacco treatment program (ELEVATE) featuring an electronic health record-enabled smoking module and decision support tools to increase the reach and effectiveness of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment.
Methods: This study included adult outpatient tobacco smokers (n=13,651) in medical oncology, internal medicine, and surgical oncology clinics from a large midwestern healthcare system. We examined reach and effectiveness of ELEVATE with 2 comparisons: (1) preimplementation versus postimplementation of ELEVATE and (2) ELEVATE versus usual care. Data were evaluated during 2 time periods: preimplementation (January through May 2018) and postimplementation (June through December 2018), with smoking cessation assessed at the last follow-up outpatient encounter during the 6 months after these periods.
Results: The proportion of current tobacco smokers receiving cessation treatment increased from pre-ELEVATE to post-ELEVATE (1.6%-27.9%; difference, 26.3%; relative risk, 16.9 [95% CI, 9.8-29.2]; P<.001). Compared with 27.9% treatment reach with ELEVATE in the postimplementation time period, reach within usual care clinics ranged from 11.8% to 12.0% during this same period. The proportion of tobacco smokers who subsequently achieved cessation increased significantly from pre-ELEVATE to post-ELEVATE (12.0% vs 17.2%; difference, 5.2%; relative risk, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.5]; P=.002). Compared with 17.2% smoking cessation with ELEVATE in the postimplementation time period, achievement of cessation within usual care clinics ranged from 8.2% to 9.9% during this same period.
Conclusions: A low-burden, point-of-care tobacco treatment strategy increased tobacco treatment and cessation, thereby improving access to and the impact of evidence-based cessation treatment. Using implementation strategies to embed tobacco treatment in every healthcare encounter promises to engage more smokers in evidence-based treatment and facilitate smoking cessation, thereby improving care cancer for patients who smoke.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Care-paradigm shift promoting smoking cessation treatment among cancer center patients via a low-burden strategy, Electronic Health Record-Enabled Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment.Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1504-1514. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz107. Transl Behav Med. 2020. PMID: 31313808 Free PMC article.
-
Time to put it out - nurse-facilitated tobacco treatment in a comprehensive cancer center.Transl Behav Med. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):1726-1738. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab073. Transl Behav Med. 2021. PMID: 34347876 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Tobacco Treatment Into Oncology Care: Reach and Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Tobacco Treatment Across National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers.J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 20;41(15):2756-2766. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00936. Epub 2022 Dec 6. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36473135 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013413.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33284989 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 7;6(6):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37286509 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enabling tobacco treatment for gastroenterology patients via a novel low-burden point-of-care model.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11092-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38902682 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging Implementation Science in the Treatment of Tobacco Use Disorder.Mo Med. 2023 Jul-Aug;120(4):285-291. Mo Med. 2023. PMID: 37609466 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-generated health data: Impact on promoting patient-centered point of care tobacco treatment in patients with cancer.J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 28;9(1):e114. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.77. eCollection 2025. J Clin Transl Sci. 2025. PMID: 40529004 Free PMC article.
-
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center: Cancer Prevention Perspective.Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 Oct 2;16(10):541-544. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0042. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023. PMID: 37779458 Free PMC article.
-
Data envelopment analysis to evaluate the efficiency of tobacco treatment programs in the NCI Moonshot Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.Implement Sci Commun. 2023 May 11;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00433-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2023. PMID: 37170381 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC. Tobacco and Cancer: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019. [updated 22 October 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/tobacco/index.htm.
-
- Lortet-Tieulent J, Goding Sauer A, Siegel RL, et al. State-Level Cancer Mortality Attributable to Cigarette Smoking in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(12):1792–8. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Cancer Statistics: NIH; 2018. [updated 27 April 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.
-
- Hanagiri T, Sugio K, Mizukami M, et al. Significance of Smoking as a Postoperative Prognostic Factor in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2008;3(10):1127–32. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical