Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;20(5):488-495.e4.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7333.

Increased Reach and Effectiveness With a Low-Burden Point-of-Care Tobacco Treatment Program in Cancer Clinics

Affiliations

Increased Reach and Effectiveness With a Low-Burden Point-of-Care Tobacco Treatment Program in Cancer Clinics

Alex T Ramsey et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco cessation after a cancer diagnosis can extend patient survival by improving outcomes for primary cancer and preventing secondary cancers. However, smoking is often unaddressed in cancer care, highlighting the need for strategies to increase treatment reach and cessation. This study examined a low-burden, point-of-care tobacco treatment program (ELEVATE) featuring an electronic health record-enabled smoking module and decision support tools to increase the reach and effectiveness of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment.

Methods: This study included adult outpatient tobacco smokers (n=13,651) in medical oncology, internal medicine, and surgical oncology clinics from a large midwestern healthcare system. We examined reach and effectiveness of ELEVATE with 2 comparisons: (1) preimplementation versus postimplementation of ELEVATE and (2) ELEVATE versus usual care. Data were evaluated during 2 time periods: preimplementation (January through May 2018) and postimplementation (June through December 2018), with smoking cessation assessed at the last follow-up outpatient encounter during the 6 months after these periods.

Results: The proportion of current tobacco smokers receiving cessation treatment increased from pre-ELEVATE to post-ELEVATE (1.6%-27.9%; difference, 26.3%; relative risk, 16.9 [95% CI, 9.8-29.2]; P<.001). Compared with 27.9% treatment reach with ELEVATE in the postimplementation time period, reach within usual care clinics ranged from 11.8% to 12.0% during this same period. The proportion of tobacco smokers who subsequently achieved cessation increased significantly from pre-ELEVATE to post-ELEVATE (12.0% vs 17.2%; difference, 5.2%; relative risk, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.5]; P=.002). Compared with 17.2% smoking cessation with ELEVATE in the postimplementation time period, achievement of cessation within usual care clinics ranged from 8.2% to 9.9% during this same period.

Conclusions: A low-burden, point-of-care tobacco treatment strategy increased tobacco treatment and cessation, thereby improving access to and the impact of evidence-based cessation treatment. Using implementation strategies to embed tobacco treatment in every healthcare encounter promises to engage more smokers in evidence-based treatment and facilitate smoking cessation, thereby improving care cancer for patients who smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Barriers and Strategies in a low burden point of care treatment program
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Increase in reach and effectiveness in medical oncology (pre vs. post)
This figure includes the proportions and 95% CI of assessed smokers who received treatment (Reach: % Treated) and assessed smokers who successfully quit smoking (Effectiveness: % Quit) during pre-ELEVATE and post-ELEVATE in the Medical Oncology setting. For Reach: In GEE Poisson analyses, we observed an increase in smoking cessation treatment reach among smokers from pre- to post-ELEVATE, adjusting for patient demographics and repeated patients within departments (1.6% to 27.9%, difference=26.3%, RR=16.9 [9.8, 29.2], p<0.001). For Effectiveness: In GEE Poisson analyses, we observed an increase in smoking cessation among smokers from pre- to post-ELEVATE, adjusting for patient demographics and repeated patients within departments (12.0% vs. 17.2%, difference=5.2%, RR=1.3 [1.1–1.5], p=0.002)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. CDC. Tobacco and Cancer: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019. [updated 22 October 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/tobacco/index.htm.
    1. Lortet-Tieulent J, Goding Sauer A, Siegel RL, et al. State-Level Cancer Mortality Attributable to Cigarette Smoking in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(12):1792–8. - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Statistics: NIH; 2018. [updated 27 April 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.
    1. Hanagiri T, Sugio K, Mizukami M, et al. Significance of Smoking as a Postoperative Prognostic Factor in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2008;3(10):1127–32. - PubMed
    1. Clement-Duchene C, Stock S, Xu X, et al. Survival among Never-Smokers with Lung Cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(1):58–66. - PMC - PubMed