Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Nov 1;93(5):632-638.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003678. Epub 2022 May 12.

Reading the signs in penetrating cervical vascular injuries: Analysis of hard/soft signs and initial management from a nationwide vascular trauma database

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Reading the signs in penetrating cervical vascular injuries: Analysis of hard/soft signs and initial management from a nationwide vascular trauma database

Alexander Marrotte et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Algorithms for management of penetrating cervical vascular injuries (PCVIs) commonly call for immediate surgery with "hard signs" and imaging before intervention with "soft signs." We sought to analyze the association between initial examination and subsequent evaluation and management approaches.

Methods: Analysis of PCVIs from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment vascular injury registry from 25 US trauma centers was performed. Patients were categorized by initial examination findings of hard signs or soft signs, and subsequent imaging and surgical exploration/repair rates were compared.

Results: Of 232 PCVI patients, 110 (47%) had hard signs (hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, or ischemia) and 122 (53%) had soft signs. With hard signs, 61 (56%) had immediate operative exploration and 44% underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging. After CT, 20 (18%) required open surgical repair, and 7% had endovascular intervention. Of note, 21 (19%) required no operative intervention. A total of 122 patients (53%) had soft signs on initial examination; 37 (30%) had immediate surgery, and 85 (70%) underwent CT imaging. After CT, 9% had endovascular repair, 7% had open surgery, and 65 (53%) were observed. No difference in mortality was observed for hard signs patients undergoing operative management versus observation alone (23% vs. 17%, p = 0.6). Those with hemorrhage as the primary hard signs most often required surgery (76%), but no interventions were required in 19% of hemorrhage, 20% of ischemia, and 24% of expanding hematoma.

Conclusion: Although hard signs in PCVIs are associated with the need for operative intervention, initial CT imaging can facilitate endovascular options or nonoperative management in a significant subgroup. Hard signs should not be considered an absolute indication for immediate surgical exploration.

Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tisherman SA, Bokhari F, Collier B, Cumming J, Ebert J, Holevar M, et al. Clinical practice guideline: penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Trauma . 2008;64(5):1392–1405.
    1. Nowicki JL, Stew B, Ooi E. Penetrating neck injuries: a guide to evaluation and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl . 2018;100(1):6–11.
    1. Breeze J, Bowley DM, Combes JG, Baden J, Orr L, Beggs A, et al. Outcomes following penetrating neck injury during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: a comparison of treatment at US and United Kingdom medical treatment facilities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;88(5):696–703.
    1. Ibraheem K, Khan M, Rhee P, Azim A, O’Keeffe T, Tang A, et al. “No zone” approach in penetrating neck trauma reduces unnecessary computed tomography angiography and negative explorations. J Surg Res . 2018;221:113–120.
    1. Apffelstaedt JP, Müller R. Results of mandatory exploration for penetrating neck trauma. World J Surg . 1994;18(6):917–919; discussion 920.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources