Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;50(5):3000605221097492.
doi: 10.1177/03000605221097492.

Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation

Minh Tam Le  1   2 , Hong Nhan Thi Dang  1 , Trung Van Nguyen  1 , Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen  1 , Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen  2 , Ngoc Thanh Cao  1   2
Affiliations

Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation

Minh Tam Le et al. J Int Med Res. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to determine the effect of swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) on sperm survival and DNA fragmentation.

Methods: Individual semen samples were analyzed before each was divided into two aliquots (half for SU and half for DGC) for calculation of sperm survival and the DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Sperm DNA fragmentation was determined using the sperm chromatin dispersion test.

Results: The DFI of the 63 semen samples processed using both procedures was lower than that of the fresh semen samples. The DFI was significantly lower for samples processed using the SU than DGC method. In the sperm survival test, the SU technique was associated with increased sperm motility and vitality following preparation. After 24 hours, however, the concentration and percentage of surviving sperm were significantly lower in the SU than DGC group.

Conclusions: Both semen preparation techniques help to minimize sperm DNA fragmentation; however, when the DFI is <30%, the SU technique is more appropriate than DGC. While DGC may be superior for intrauterine insemination, the SU method may be preferable for in vitro fertilization or maturation.

Keywords: DNA fragmentation index; Swim-up; density gradient centrifugation; sperm DNA fragmentation; sperm preparation; sperm survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Box and whisker plots for the DFI in different groups of patients showing the median and interquartile ranges. (1) DFI of fresh semen samples. (2) DFI after performing the SU technique. (3) DFI after performing the DGC technique. The dots indicate values outside the range. DFI, DNA fragmentation index; SU, swim-up; DGC, density gradient centrifugation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kumar N, Singh AK. Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: a review of literature. J Hum Reprod Sci 2015; 8: 191–196. 10.4103/0974-1208.170370. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, et al.. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 37. 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, et al.; National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388–1393. 10.1056/NEJMoa003005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jackson RE, Bormann CL, Hassun PA, et al.. Effects of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2626–2630. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. The effect of sperm DNA damage on assisted reproduction outcomes. A review. Minerva Ginecol 2004; 56: 235–245. Available from: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/15258535 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources