An exploration in pitfalls in interpreting SDHB immunohistochemistry
- PMID: 35546442
- DOI: 10.1111/his.14681
An exploration in pitfalls in interpreting SDHB immunohistochemistry
Abstract
Aims: Mutations and epimutations in genes encoding the succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDHx) are associated with multiple tumour types in which identification of SDH-deficiency has significant management implications. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) subunit can help to detect SDH-deficiency, which manifests as complete loss of staining in tumour cells. However, a subset of SDH-deficient tumours can show aberrant cytoplasmic SDHB-IHC staining patterns and be misinterpreted as 'retained', a diagnostic pitfall complicating interpretation. Herein, we characterise in detail aberrant SDHB-IHC staining patterns in SDH-deficient tumours.
Methods and results: We identified 23 tumours from patients with known germline SDHx and/or molecularly confirmed SDHx pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variants in their tumour. Of these, eight (35%) showed significant SDHB-IHC staining: one SDHA-, one SDHB-, three SDHC- and three SDHD-mutated cases. In all eight cases, closer inspection revealed differences in intensity and intracellular distribution of SDHB-IHC staining in tumour cells compared to adjacent non-neoplastic cells: non-neoplastic cells showed intense cytoplasmic coarse granular staining; tumour cells in seven of eight cases showed weak to focally strong, cytoplasmic blush to fine granular staining, in > 80% of cells. The remaining case in the initial block showed variably strong non-granular cytoplasmic staining with globular perinuclear accentuation throughout, only subtly distinct from the staining pattern of non-neoplastic cells. SDHB-IHC performed on two additional blocks in this latter case revealed significant intratumoral heterogeneity, including convincing areas of complete loss.
Conclusions: When evaluating SDHB-IHC, care should be taken to distinguish true retained expression from aberrant cytoplasmic expression, which may be difficult to appreciate. Sometimes this may require additional molecular testing.
Keywords: gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST); immunohistochemistry; paraganglioma; renal cell carcinoma; succinate dehydrogenase (SDH).
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Gill AJ. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia. Histopathology 2018; 72; 106-116.
-
- Killian JK, Miettinen M, Walker RL et al. Recurrent epimutation of SDHC in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014; 6; 268ra177.
-
- Casey RT, Ten Hoopen R, Ochoa E et al. SDHC epi-mutation testing in gastrointestinal stromal tumours and related tumours in clinical practice. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9; 10244.
-
- Burnichon N, Brière JJ, Libé R et al. SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010; 19; 3011-3020.
-
- Hensen EF, Bayley J-P. Recent advances in the genetics of SDH-related paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Fam. Cancer 2011; 10; 355-363.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
