Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Dec;35(6):1124-1135.
doi: 10.1111/jhn.13029. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Low glycaemic index and glycaemic load diets in adults with excess weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Lisiane Perin  1 , Isadora G Camboim  1   2 , Alexandre M Lehnen  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Low glycaemic index and glycaemic load diets in adults with excess weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Lisiane Perin et al. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: To compare the effects of low and high glycaemic index/glycaemic load (GI/GL) diets on body weight in adults with excess weight.

Methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing low GI/GL vs. high GI/GL diets from Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. The variables of interest were anthropometric measurements, fasting glucose and fasting insulin levels and lipid profile, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

Results: The sample size ranged from 19 to 203 participants. Low GI/GL is not superior to high GI/GL diets on body weight reduction in adults with excess weight (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg m-2 ). However, low GI/GL diets show greater body weight reductions in adults with BMI ≥ 30 kg m-2 (-0.93 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.73 to -0.12; p = 0.045). Compared with high GI/GL diets, low GI/GL diets may also help reduce fasting glucose (-1.97 mg dl-1 ; 95% CI = -3.76 to 0.19; p = 0.030) and fasting insulin (-0.55 µU ml-1 ; 95% CI = -0.95 to -0.15; p = 0.007). No differences in fat mass, fat-free mass, waist circumference and lipid profile were observed between low GI/GL and high GI/GL diets. The risk of bias for body weight was classified as 'low risk' (25% of the studies) and 'some concerns' for all domains of RoB 2 tool in most studies.

Conclusions: When compared with high GI/GL diets, low GI/GL diets appear to more effectively reduce fasting glucose and insulin and promote greater body weight reduction in adults with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg m-2 ).

Keywords: glucose; glycaemic index; glycaemic load; insulin; weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Franklin N, Arena R. Personalized weight management interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction: a viable option for African-American women. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58:595-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.02.003
    1. Augustin L, Franceschi S, Jenkins D, Kendall C, La Vecchia C. Glycemic index in chronic disease: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:1049-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601454
    1. Sheard NF, Clark NG, Brand-Miller JC, Franz MJ, Pi-Sunyer FX, Mayer-Davis E, et al. Dietary carbohydrate (amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement by the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27:2266-71. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.9.2266
    1. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:5-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.1.5
    1. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2281-83. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1239

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources