Risk Factors for Femoral Cortical Button Malposition in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- PMID: 35547612
- PMCID: PMC9083064
- DOI: 10.1177/23259671221094292
Risk Factors for Femoral Cortical Button Malposition in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Femoral cortical button suspension fixation is a popular and reliable technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR). Button malposition during graft fixation can lead to postoperative graft loosening.
Purpose: To determine the risk factors of femoral cortical button malposition in PCLR when neither direct visualization nor intraoperative fluoroscopy is used.
Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Of the 206 consecutive patients who underwent PCLR without direct visualization or intraoperative radiographs in 2019 at a single institution, 182 met the selection criteria and were included in the study. The distance from the suspension button to the femoral cortex was measured on postoperative computed tomography scans. The button was considered malpositioned if its distance to the femoral cortex was ≥2 mm. We evaluated patient-related and surgery-related variables, including age, sex, concomitant ligament reconstruction, button type, and surgeon experience. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the risk factors for button malposition.
Results: The overall prevalence of button malposition was approximately 17.0% (31/182), and the mean distance from the button to the femoral cortex was 6.11 ± 5.82 mm in the malposition group. Male sex was the most significant risk factor for button malposition (odds ratio [OR], 13.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-111.17; P = .013). Other independent risk factors were low surgical volume (completing ≤3 procedures; OR, 6.41; 95% CI, 1.89-21.72; P = .003), concomitant ligament reconstruction (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 2.12-14.58; P < .001), and fixed-loop button (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.11-14.18; P = .034).
Conclusion: Male sex, low surgical volume, concomitant ligament reconstruction, and fixed-loop button were independent risk factors for femoral cortical button malposition during PCLR.
Keywords: button malposition; femoral cortical button; posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; suspensory fixation.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding was received from the Education Department of Hunan Province (No.20C1144). AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Femoral Cortical Button Fixation: A Case Series of Intraoperative Malpositioning.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Oct 27;11(10):23259671231205926. doi: 10.1177/23259671231205926. eCollection 2023 Oct. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37900863 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral Cortical Button Malposition Rates in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Review.Orthopedics. 2019 Jan 1;42(1):e56-e60. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20181109-04. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Orthopedics. 2019. PMID: 30427053
-
Lower button-cortex distance and lower revision rates with adjustable-loop compared to fixed-loop cortical suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 22;12(1):e70212. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70212. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40123678 Free PMC article.
-
Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 7;21(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03471-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32635920 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral cross-pin fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Jan 29;32(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-0028-9. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32660647 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Safe femoral tunnel drilling angles avoid injury to the medial and posteromedial femoral anatomic structures during single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the inside-out technique.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3390-3398. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07412-0. Epub 2023 Apr 11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37039872
-
Arthroscopic Confirmation of Femoral Button Deployment During Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Apr 6;13(6):102978. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102978. eCollection 2024 Jun. Arthrosc Tech. 2024. PMID: 39036411 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Balldin BC, Nuelle CW, DeBerardino TM. Is intraoperative fluoroscopy necessary to confirm device position for femoral-sided cortical suspensory fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? J Knee Surg. 2020;33(3):265–269. - PubMed
-
- Bellinger P, Bourne MN, Duhig S, et al. Relationships between lower limb muscle characteristics and force-velocity profiles derived during sprinting and jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(7):1400–1411. - PubMed
-
- Doss W, Osborn N, McCormack R, Ruotolo C. Direct visualization of the femoral cortical button in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction helps ensure proper positioning. Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):191–195. - PubMed
-
- Gallina A, Render JN, Santos J, et al. Influence of knee joint position and sex on vastus medialis regional architecture. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43(6):643–646. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous