Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 25:9:851447.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.851447. eCollection 2022.

Preoperative Nomogram and Risk Calculator for Postoperative Hypoxemia and Related Clinical Outcomes Following Stanford Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery

Affiliations

Preoperative Nomogram and Risk Calculator for Postoperative Hypoxemia and Related Clinical Outcomes Following Stanford Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery

Weiyong Sheng et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Hypoxemia is a common complication after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery (AADS), however, few studies about hypoxemia after AADS exist. The aims of this study were to identify independent risk factors for hypoxemia after AADS and to clarify its association with clinical outcomes.

Methods: Patients undergoing AADS from 2016 to 2019 in our hospital were identified and used as a training set. Preoperative variables were first screened by univariate analysis and then entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram and an online risk calculator were constructed based on the logistic model to facilitate clinical practice and was externally validated in an independent dataset.

Results: Severe hypoxemia developed in 119 of the 492 included patients (24.2%) and poorer clinical outcomes were observed in these patients. Five independent risk factors for severe hypoxemia after AADS were identified by multivariate analysis, including older age, smoking history, renal insufficiency, higher body mass index, and white blood cell count. The model showed good calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility in the training set, and was well validated in the validation set. Risk stratification was performed and three risk groups were defined as low, medium, and high risk groups. Hypertension was identified as an independent risk factor for moderate hypoxemia besides the five predictors mentioned above, and renal insufficiency was not significant for mild hypoxemia by multivariate analysis. In addition, although frozen elephant trunk was associated with increased risk of postoperative hypoxemia in the univariate analysis, frozen elephant trunk was also not identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative hypoxemia in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: Hypoxemia was frequent following AADS, related to poorer clinical outcomes. Predictors were identified and a nomogram as well as an online risk calculator predicting severe hypoxemia after AADS was developed and validated, which may be helpful for risk estimation and perioperative management.

Keywords: Stanford type A aortic dissection; hypoxemia; nomogram; prediction model; risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of the study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Nomogram for the prediction of severe hypoxemia in patients undergoing Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Assessment and validation of the preoperative nomogram for severe hypoxemia in patients undergoing Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery. Calibration plots in the training set (A) and the validation set (B), ROC curves in the two sets (C), decision curves in the two sets (D), and clinical impact curves in the training set (E) and the validation set (F). AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve.

References

    1. Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Kaura A, Sinha S, Mariscalco G, Krasopoulos G, et al. Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK national adult cardiac surgical audit. Eur Heart J. (2022) 43:44–52. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab586 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, Halas M, Girardi LN, Coselli JS, Sundt TM, et al. 2021 the American association for thoracic surgery expert consensus document: surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. Journal Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2021) 162:735–58. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou J, Pan J, Yu Y, Huang W, Lai Y, Liang W, et al. Independent risk factors of hypoxemia in patients after surgery with acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Palliat Med. (2021) 10:7388–97. 10.21037/apm-21-1428 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunham AM, Grega MA, Brown CT, McKhann GM, Baumgartner WA, Gottesman RF. Perioperative low arterial oxygenation is associated with increased stroke risk in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. (2017) 125:38–43. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranucci M, Ballotta A, La Rovere MT, Castelvecchio S. Postoperative hypoxia and length of intensive care unit stay after cardiac surgery: the underweight paradox? PLoS One. (2014) 9:e93992. 10.1371/journal.pone.0093992 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources