Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 25:13:809513.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809513. eCollection 2022.

Apology and Its Acceptance: Perceived Reconciliatory Attitudes Reduce Outgroup Dehumanization

Wen Jie Jin  1 , Sang Hee Park  1 , Joonha Park  2
Affiliations

Apology and Its Acceptance: Perceived Reconciliatory Attitudes Reduce Outgroup Dehumanization

Wen Jie Jin et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Based on real-life intergroup animosities originating from a historical conflict, the current study examined how the perceived stance of the outgroup about the conflict affects the dehumanization of the outgroup. In Study 1 (N = 120), Korean undergraduates attributed more human nature to the Japanese after reading an article that the Japanese government did (vs. refused to) issue an official apology for a historical wrong. In turn, the more human nature assigned to the Japanese predicted higher expectations about positive mutual relations in the future. Similarly, in Study 2 (N = 209), Japanese undergraduates attributed more human uniqueness to Koreans after reading an article that an official apology for a historical wrong from Japan was accepted (vs. rejected) by Koreans. The higher the perceived human uniqueness of Koreans was, the higher were the willingness to help and the expectations of a positive relationship in the future. The findings demonstrate how mutual dehumanization can be reduced as a result of the other side's reconciliatory stances and can further contribute to improving intergroup relations.

Keywords: acceptance; apology; historical conflict; human nature; human uniqueness; intergroup relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
HN mediating the relationship between condition and willingness to help (Study 1). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
HN mediating the relationship between condition and willingness to forgive (Study 1). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
HN mediating the relationship between condition and expectation of a future relationship (Study 1). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
HU mediating the relationship between perceived apology acceptance and willingness to help (Study 2). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
HU mediating the relationship between perceived apology acceptance and willingness to apologize (Study 2). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
HU mediating the relationship between perceived apology acceptance and expectation of a future relationship (Study 2). Unstandardized coefficients are presented. Coefficients in parentheses denote direct effects after controlling for indirect effects. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andrighetto L., Baldissarri C., Lattanzio S., Loughnan S., Volpato C. (2014). Human-itarian aid? Two forms of dehumanization and willingness to help after natural disasters. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 53 573–584. 10.1111/bjso.12066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bain P., Park J., Kwok C., Haslam N. (2009). Attributing human uniqueness and human nature to cultural groups: distinct forms of subtle dehumanization. Group Proc. Intergr. Relat. 12 789–805. 10.1177/1368430209340415 - DOI
    1. Bandura A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 3 193–209. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandura A., Underwood B., Fromson M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. J. Res. Pers. 9 253–269. 10.1016/0092-6566(75)90001-X - DOI
    1. Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator−mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 1173–1182. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources