Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 18;2(2):192-201.
doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants

Affiliations
Review

Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants

Mark H J Sturme et al. ACS Agric Sci Technol. .

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing allows for precise and targeted genetic modification of plants. Nevertheless, unintended off-target edits can arise that might confer risks when present in gene-edited food crops. Through an extensive literature review we gathered information on CRISPR-Cas off-target edits in plants. Most observed off-target changes were small insertions or deletions (1-22 bp) or nucleotide substitutions, and large deletions (>100 bp) were rare. One study detected the insertion of vector-derived DNA sequences, which is important considering the risk assessment of gene-edited plants. Off-target sites had few mismatches (1-3 nt) with the target sequence and were mainly located in protein-coding regions, often in target gene homologues. Off-targets edits were predominantly detected via biased analysis of predicted off-target sites instead of unbiased genome-wide analysis. CRISPR-Cas-edited plants showed lower off-target mutation frequencies than conventionally bred plants. This Review can aid discussions on the relevance of evaluating off-target modifications for risk assessment of CRISPR-Cas-edited plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic overview of the types of SDN modifications. The asterisks (*) signify nucleotides (in color) that are not identical to the native host sequence (in gray) around the double-stranded break introduced by the SDN. Such nonidentical nucleotides are introduced either through substitution or through insertion of nucleotides during the process of DNA break repair. SDN-1 applications can generate 1 base pair (bp) up to a small number of base insertions/deletions (indels) without providing a donor DNA template, through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Occasionally larger deletions may occur as a result of alternative repair mechanisms such as microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). SDN-2 applications can generate precise and small genetic modifications at the target site, ranging from point mutations to small indels, by means of a donor DNA template for homology-directed repair (HDR). SDN-3 applications can insert entire DNA cassettes into a target site, by providing a large donor DNA template of the desired gene, which leads to insertion by HDR or NHEJ and a transgenic plant if the donor originates from an unrelated species.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic overview of the mutation frequencies of different plant breeding techniques, based on our literature study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Molla K. A.; Sretenovic S.; Bansal K. C.; Qi Y. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nature Plants 2021, 7 (9), 1166–1187. 10.1038/s41477-021-00991-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah T.; Andleeb T.; Lateef S.; Noor M. A. Genome editing in plants: Advancing crop transformation and overview of tools. Plant Physiol Biochem 2018, 131, 12–21. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.05.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Modrzejewski D.; Hartung F.; Lehnert H.; Sprink T.; Kohl C.; Keilwagen J.; Wilhelm R. Which Factors Affect the Occurrence of Off-Target Effects Caused by the Use of CRISPR/Cas: A Systematic Review in Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 574959.10.3389/fpls.2020.574959. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrangou R.; Marraffini L. A. CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol. Cell 2014, 54 (2), 234–44. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koonin E. V.; Makarova K. S.; Zhang F. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr. Opin Microbiol 2017, 37, 67–78. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources