Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 2;8(59):33947-33951.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra04935a. eCollection 2018 Sep 28.

A highly sensitive and selective chemosensor for Pb2+ based on quinoline-coumarin

Affiliations

A highly sensitive and selective chemosensor for Pb2+ based on quinoline-coumarin

Xianjiao Meng et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

In this study, a highly sensitive and selective fluorescent chemosensor, ethyl(E)-2-((2-((2-(7-(diethylamino)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carbonyl)hydrazono)methyl)quinolin-8-yl)oxy)acetate (1), was synthesized and characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and ESI-MS. Sensor 1 showed an "on-off" fluorescence response to Pb2+ with a 1 : 1 binding stoichiometry in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v). The detection limit of sensor 1 to Pb2+ was determined to be 0.5 μM, and the stable pH range for Pb2+ detection was from 4 to 8.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Variation of fluorescence intensity of sensor 1 (10 μM) in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v, pH = 7.4) with and without Pb2+ ions (10 equiv.) with pH at room temperature.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a) UV-vis spectra of 1 (10 μM) with the addition of different metal ions (10 equiv.) in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v, pH = 7.4). Inset: the color changed of probe 1 (10 μM) in the absence and presence of Pb2+ (20 equiv.).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. UV-vis spectra of sensor 1 (10 μM) with the addition of various concentrations [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 and 20 equiv.] of Pb2+ in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v, pH = 7.4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a) Fluorescence spectra of sensor 1 (10 μM) with the addition of different metal ions (10 equiv.) in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v, pH = 7.4) with an excitation at 440 nm. Inset: the fluorescence changed of probe 1 (10 μM) in the absence and presence of Pb2+ (20 equiv.) under UV light at 365 nm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Fluorescent intensity of sensor 1 (10 μM) with selected cations (10 equiv.) in the absence (red bars) or presence (black bars) of Pb2+ (10 equiv.).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Fluorescence spectra of sensor 1 (1 μM) with the addition of various concentrations [0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 and 10 equiv.] of Pb2+ in CH3CN/HEPES buffer medium (9 : 1 v/v, pH = 7.4) with an excitation at 440 nm. Inset: the Job plots with fluorescence titrations showed an intersection point at about 0.5 mol fractions, indicating that sensor 1 formed a 1 : 1 complex with Pb2+.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of sensor 1.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. The Benesi–Hildebrand plot of sensor 1 with Pb2+. Linear equation: Y = 5.09 × 10−9 × X + 1.04 × 10−5, R2 = 0.9973, Ka = 2043 M−1.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. The plot of the intensity at 485 nm for a mixture of sensor 1 and Pb2+ in CH3CN/HEPES (9 : 1, v/v) buffer (pH = 7.4) in the range 0.1–1 equiv. (λex = 440 nm). The calculated detection limit of 1 is 5 × 10−7 M.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. The possible mechanism of sensor 1 with Pb2+.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang Z. Q. He X. W. Shang Y. J. Yu Z. Y. Wang S. F. Wu F. L. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2017;33:31–35. doi: 10.1007/s40242-017-6239-2. - DOI
    1. Goswami S. Manna A. Aich K. Paul S. Chem. Lett. 2012;41:1600–1602. doi: 10.1246/cl.2012.1600. - DOI
    1. Yu Y. Dou W. Hu X. Tang X. L. Zhou X. Y. Liu W. S. J. Fluoresc. 2012;22:1547–1553. doi: 10.1007/s10895-012-1093-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zapata F. Caballero A. Espinosa A. Tárraga A. Molina P. Org. Lett. 2007;9:2385–2388. doi: 10.1021/ol070828r. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sunnapu O. Kotla N. G. Maddiboyina B. Singaravadivel S. Sivaraman G. RSC Adv. 2016;6:656–660. doi: 10.1039/C5RA20482H. - DOI