Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;28(2):166-170.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20991.

Paracentesis: Faster and easier using the RenovaRP® pump

Affiliations

Paracentesis: Faster and easier using the RenovaRP® pump

Shane N Weber et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

PURPOSE Paracentesis is commonly performed in interventional radiology practice, and large volume paracentesis (LVP) using wall suction can take up to an hour to complete, placing significant stress on room and resource time. As the number of LVP procedures performed by Interventional Radiologists continue to increase, this study was undertaken to analyze the impact of the RenovaRP® Paracentesis Management System (GI Supply) on procedure time and patient satisfaction. METHODS Between March 9, 2020 and May 29, 2020, procedural data and patient satisfaction was collected as part of a practice quality improvement project and retrospectively analyzed on 39 sequential paracenteses performed with wall suction prior to acquiring the RenovaRP® system and subsequently on 42 paracenteses performed with use of the device. RESULTS A substantially higher fluid flow rate was found using the RenovaRP® system compared to wall suction, 237.2 mL/min vs. 108.6 mL/min (P < .001). This resulted in a significant decrease in procedure room time from 53 min to 31 min (P < .001). There was associated improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis. CONCLUSION The RenovaRP® decreases procedure time for LVP with improvement in the patient experience during paracentesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure: The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of the RenovaRP® system.
Table 1. Summary of results
Table 1. Summary of results

References

    1. Bieker E. Diagnosis and Therapy of Ascites in Liver Cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(10):1237–1248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sangisetty SL, Miner TJ. Malignant Ascites: A Review of Prognostic Factors, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Measures. Gastrointest Surg. 2012;4(4):87–95. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i4.87. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duszak R, Chatterjee AR, Schneider DA. National fluid shits: Fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(11):859–864. - PubMed
    1. Gottumukkala RV, Prabhakar AM, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Duszak R Jr. Disparities over Time in Volume, Day of the Week, and Patient Complexity between Paracentesis and Thoracentesis Procedures Performed by Radiologists versus Those Performed by Nonradiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(11):1769–1778. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barsuk JH, Feinglass J, Kozmic SE, Hohmann SF, Ganger D, Wayne DB. Specialties performing paracentesis procedures at university hospitals: Implications for training and certification. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(3):162–168. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2153. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources