Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 12;20(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00729-w.

Evaluation of the first two Frontline cohorts of the field epidemiology training program in Guinea, West Africa

Affiliations

Evaluation of the first two Frontline cohorts of the field epidemiology training program in Guinea, West Africa

Doreen Collins et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Background: The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa revealed weaknesses in the health systems of the three most heavily affected countries, including a shortage of public health professionals at the local level trained in surveillance and outbreak investigation. In response, the Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) was created by CDC in 2015 as a 3-month, accelerated training program in field epidemiology that specifically targets the district level. In Guinea, the first two FETP-Frontline cohorts were held from January to May, and from June to September 2017. Here, we report the results of a cross-sectional evaluation of these first two cohorts of FETP-Frontline in Guinea.

Methods: The evaluation was conducted in April 2018 and consisted of interviews with graduates, their supervisors, and directors of nearby health facilities, as well as direct observation of data reports and surveillance tools at health facilities. Interviews and site visits were conducted using standardized questionnaires and checklists. Qualitative data were coded under common themes and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The evaluation revealed a significant perception of improvement in all assessed skills by the graduates, as well as high levels of self-reported involvement in key activities related to data collection, analysis, and reporting. Supervisors highlighted improvements to systematic and quality case and summary reporting as key benefits of the FETP-Frontline program. At the health facility level, staff reported the training had resulted in improvements to information sharing and case notifications. Reported barriers included lack of transportation, available support personnel, and other resources. Graduates and supervisors both emphasized the importance of continued and additional training to solidify and retain skills.

Conclusions: The evaluation demonstrated a strongly positive perceived benefit of the FETP-Frontline training on the professional activities of graduates as well as the overall surveillance system. However, efforts are needed to ensure greater gender equity and to recruit more junior trainee candidates for future cohorts. Moreover, although improvements to the surveillance system were observed concurrent with the completion of the two cohorts, the evaluation was not designed to directly measure impact on surveillance or response functions. Combined with the rapid implementation of FETP-Frontline around the world, this suggests an opportunity to develop standardized evaluation toolkits, which could incorporate metrics that would directly assess the impact of equitable field epidemiology workforce development on countries' abilities to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats.

Keywords: Field epidemiology; Workforce development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of districts staffed by Guinea FETP-Frontline graduates, Cohorts 1 and 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of improvements reported by supervisors for FETP-Frontline program graduates
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graduate perceptions on the most important outcome of FETP-Frontline training on the surveillance system

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The World Bank. Implementation Completion and Results Report (TF-14785). Washington; 2018.
    1. Afriyie DO, Nyoni J, Ahmat A. The state of strategic plans for the health workforce in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001115. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baize S, Pannetier D, Oestereich L, Rieger T, Koivogui L, Magassouba N, et al. Emergence of Zaire Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1418–1425. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404505. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahl BA, Kinzer MH, Raghunathan PL, Christie A, De Cock KM, Mahoney F, et al. CDC’s Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. MMWR Suppl. 2016;65:12–20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6503a3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. André AM, Lopez A, Perkins S, Lambert S, Chace L, Noudeke N, et al. Frontline field epidemiology training programs as a strategy to improve disease surveillance and response. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:S166–S173. doi: 10.3201/eid2313.170803. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources