Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 12;17(1):196.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02343-4.

Healthcare access, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life among children and adults with rare diseases

Collaborators, Affiliations

Healthcare access, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life among children and adults with rare diseases

Kathleen Bogart et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Research in a variety of countries indicates that healthcare access and health-related quality of life are challenged among people with a variety of rare diseases (RDs). However, there has been little systematic research on the experiences of children and adults with RDs in the American healthcare system that identifies commonalities across RDs. This research aimed to: (1) Describe demographics, disease characteristics, diagnostic experiences, access to healthcare, knowledge about RDs, support from healthcare professionals, and patient satisfaction among people with RDs and their caregivers; (2) examine predictors of patient satisfaction among adults with RDs; (3) compare health-related quality of life and stigma to US population norms; 4) examine predictors of anxiety and depression among adults and children with RDs.

Results: This large-scale survey included (n = 1128) adults with RD or parents or caregivers of children with RDs representing 344 different RDs. About one third of participants waited four or more years for a diagnosis and misdiagnosis was common. A subset of participants reported experiencing insurance-related delays or denials for tests, treatments, specialists, or services. Approximately half of participants felt their medical and social support was sufficient, yet less than a third had sufficient dental and psychological support. Patients were generally neither satisfied or dissatisfied with their healthcare providers. Major predictors of satisfaction were lower stigma, lower anxiety, shorter diagnostic odyssey, greater physical function, and less pain interference. Adults and children with RDs had significantly poorer health-related quality of life and stigma in all domains compared to US norms. Predictors of both anxiety and depression were greater stigma/poor peer relationships, fatigue, sleep disturbance, limited ability to participate in social roles, and unstable disease course.

Conclusions: People in the U.S. with RDs have poor health-related quality of life and high stigma. These factors are related to patient satisfaction and healthcare access, including diagnostic delays and misdiagnosis. Advocacy work is needed in order to improve healthcare access and ultimately health-related quality of life for children and adults with RDs.

Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Health-related quality of life; Patient satisfaction; Rare disease; Stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Self-reported time to get a confirmed diagnosis after seeking medical help
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participants’ ratings of providers’ knowledge of rare disease and willingness to seek support during diagnosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Self-reported out-of-pocket expenses for health claims in 2019 (USD)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Experiences with US health insurance approvals, delays, and denials for RD tests, medications, treatments, and services
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Perceptions of how well different provider types offered sufficient information about participants’ condition(s)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Perceptions of how well different provider types offered sufficient care for participants’ condition(s)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Participants’ perceptions of receiving sufficient types of support at diagnosis
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Participants’ experiences of different barriers to healthcare access

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institutes of Health, Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. FAQs about rare diseases [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 27]. https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/pages/31/faqs-about-rare-dise....
    1. Limb L, Nutt S, Sen A. Experiences of rare diseases: an insight from patients and families [Internet]. Rare Disease UK; 2010 [cited 2016 Apr 10]. http://www.raredisease.org.uk/documents/RDUK-Family-Report.pdf.
    1. Aymé S, Kole A, Groft S. Empowerment of patients: lessons from the rare diseases community. The Lancet. 2008;371(9629):2048–2051. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60875-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EURORDIS. Rare Diseases: understanding this Public Health Priority [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2017 Jul 9]. http://www.eurordis.org/IMG/pdf/princeps_document-EN.pdf.
    1. Molster C, Urwin D, Di Pietro L, Fookes M, Petrie D, van der Laan S, et al. Survey of healthcare experiences of Australian adults living with rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:30. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0409-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources