Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May 12;23(1):394.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7.

How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme

Alison Powell et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day-to-day running of a trial, outlining the working arrangements and relationships that facilitate these contributions. In doing so, we draw on (i) existing frameworks on the role of qualitative research alongside trials and (ii) our experience of integrated qualitative research conducted as part of the feasibility study of the SAFER trial (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke), a cluster randomised controlled trial of screening people aged 70 and above for atrial fibrillation in primary care in England. The activities and presence of the qualitative team contributed to important changes in the design, conduct and day-to-day running of the SAFER feasibility study, and the subsequent main trial, informing diverse decisions concerning trial documentation, trial delivery, timing and content of measures and the information given to participating patients and practices. These included asking practices to give screening results to all participants and not just to 'screen positive' participants, and greater recognition of the contribution of practice reception staff to trial delivery. These changes were facilitated by a 'one research team' approach that underpinned all formal and informal working processes from the outset and maximised the value of both qualitative and trial coordination expertise. The challenging problems facing health services require a combination of research methods and data types. Our experience and the literature show that the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials are more likely to be realised if attention is given to both structural factors and relationships from the outset. These include sustained and sufficient funding for qualitative research, embedding qualitative research fully within the trial programme, providing shared infrastructure and resources and committing to relationships based on mutual recognition of and respect for the value of different methods and perspectives. We outline key learning for the planning of future trials.Trial registration: Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke ISRCTN16939438 (feasibility study); Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke - a randomised controlled trial ISRCTN72104369 .

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Frameworks; Qualitative research with trials; Working relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Outline of the SAFER programme. Note: a second small feasibility study (introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic) was carried out in 2020-2021 to assess the feasibility of remote delivery of the screening intervention

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woolfall K, Young B, Frith L, Appleton R, Iyer A, Messahel S, et al. Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e005045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartlam B, Waterfield J, Bishop A, Holden MA, Barlas P, Ismail KM, et al. The role of qualitative research in clinical trial development: the EASE back study. J Mixed Methods Res. 2018;12(3):325–343. doi: 10.1177/1558689816656740. - DOI
    1. Evans M, Malpass A, Agnew-Davies R, Feder G. Women’s experiences of a randomised controlled trial of a specialist psychological advocacy intervention following domestic violence: a nested qualitative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0193077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouchard K, Tulloch H. Strengthening behavioral clinical trials with online qualitative research methods. J Health Psychol. 2020;25(2):256–265. doi: 10.1177/1359105319855120. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bugge C, Williams B, Hagen S, Logan J, Glazener C, Pringle S, et al. A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials. 2013;14(1):353. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353. - DOI - PMC - PubMed