Estimates of resting energy expenditure and total energy expenditure using predictive equations in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
- PMID: 35551409
- DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac031
Estimates of resting energy expenditure and total energy expenditure using predictive equations in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Abstract
Context: Energy expenditure predictive equations can generate inaccurate estimates for overweight or obese individuals.
Objective: The objective of this review was to determine which predictive equations for resting energy expenditure (REE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) have the lowest bias and the highest precision in adults with overweight and obesity.
Data sources: Searches were performed in January 2022 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and the gray literature databases.
Data extraction: Meta-analyses were performed with equations included in more than 1 study. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model and the I2 statistic were used to quantify heterogeneity in the quantitative analyses. The Egger test was performed to assess potential publication biases, and metaregressions were conducted to explore the heterogeneity. Findings were presented separated by participants' body mass index classification (overweight and obesity).
Data analysis: Sixty-one studies were included. The FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) equation, which uses only body weight in its formula, showed the lowest bias in estimating REE (mean difference [MD] = 8.97 kcal; 95% CI = -26.99; 44.94). In the subgroup analysis for individuals with obesity, the Lazzer (2007) equation showed the lowest bias (MD = 4.70 kcal; 95% CI = -95.45; 104.86). The Harris-Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision values for individuals with overweight (60.65%) and for individuals with obesity (62.54%). Equations with body composition data showed the highest biases. The equation proposed by the Institute of Medicine (2005) showed the lowest bias (MD = -2.52 kcal; 95% CI = -125.94; 120.90) in estimating the TEE. Most analyses showed high heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). There was no evidence of publication bias.
Conclusion: For individuals with overweight, the FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) and the Harris-Benedict equations (1919) showed the lowest bias and the highest precision in predicting the REE, respectively. For individuals with obesity, the Harris-Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision and the Lazzer equation (2007) showed the lowest bias. More studies are needed on predictive equations to estimate the TEE.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021262969.
Keywords: calorimetry; doubly labeled water; energy metabolism; obesity; predictive equations.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Estimates of Resting Energy Expenditure and Total Energy Expenditure Using Predictive Equations for Individuals After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):3999-4006. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06908-5. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Obes Surg. 2023. PMID: 37889369
-
Low validity of predictive equations for calculating resting energy expenditure in overweight and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;31(2):266-275. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12498. Epub 2017 Aug 8. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018. PMID: 28791776
-
Accurate determination of energy needs in hospitalized patients.J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.014. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17324656
-
Longitudinal estimates of resting energy expenditure using predictive equations in individuals with excess weight after weight loss: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Dec;58:263-269. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023. PMID: 38057015
-
Validity of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in US and Dutch overweight and obese class I and II adults aged 18-65 y.Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Oct;88(4):959-70. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.959. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18842782
Cited by
-
Components of Total Energy Expenditure in Healthy and Critically Ill Children: A Comprehensive Review.Nutrients. 2024 Aug 6;16(16):2581. doi: 10.3390/nu16162581. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39203716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Italian Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet in Overweight and Obese Patients with Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes.Nutrients. 2022 Oct 18;14(20):4361. doi: 10.3390/nu14204361. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36297044 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of predictive equations for total energy expenditure against doubly labeled water.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 8;14(1):15754. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66767-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38977928 Free PMC article.
-
Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Extreme Obesity: Comparison of the Harris-Benedict Equation with Indirect Calorimetry.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 8;13(19):5993. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195993. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39408053 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2023 Dec;53(12):2373-2398. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01896-z. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37632665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical