Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 12;12(1):7827.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11517-w.

Early prediction of acute necrotizing pancreatitis by artificial intelligence: a prospective cohort-analysis of 2387 cases

Collaborators, Affiliations

Early prediction of acute necrotizing pancreatitis by artificial intelligence: a prospective cohort-analysis of 2387 cases

Szabolcs Kiss et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Pancreatic necrosis is a consistent prognostic factor in acute pancreatitis (AP). However, the clinical scores currently in use are either too complicated or require data that are unavailable on admission or lack sufficient predictive value. We therefore aimed to develop a tool to aid in necrosis prediction. The XGBoost machine learning algorithm processed data from 2387 patients with AP. The confidence of the model was estimated by a bootstrapping method and interpreted via the 10th and the 90th percentiles of the prediction scores. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were calculated to quantify the contribution of each variable provided. Finally, the model was implemented as an online application using the Streamlit Python-based framework. The XGBoost classifier provided an AUC value of 0.757. Glucose, C-reactive protein, alkaline phosphatase, gender and total white blood cell count have the most impact on prediction based on the SHAP values. The relationship between the size of the training dataset and model performance shows that prediction performance can be improved. This study combines necrosis prediction and artificial intelligence. The predictive potential of this model is comparable to the current clinical scoring systems and has several advantages over them.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart representing the process of developing the model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between necrosis development and other complications in acute pancreatitis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the XGBoost model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The relationship between the size of the data set and the model performance. The blue dot represents the area under the ROC curve value and the vertical lines show the corresponding confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The predicted necrosis probabilities with the corresponding 50% (between the 25th and 50th percentiles) and 80% confidence (between the 10th and 90th percentiles).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) The features with the highest impact on model output based on the SHAP values. The higher the predictor is on the list, the bigger the impact on model output. Each patient is represented by a dot. The x-axis represents the extent of the impact on prediction. The color of the dot shows the feature value (e.g. the red color implies higher values). (B) An example of prediction and its textual interpretation. The lower picture highlights the effect of individual predictors and the final necrosis probability provided by the model.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The models build on the k predictors with the highest SHAP value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boxhoorn L, et al. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet (London, England) 2020;396:726–734. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31310-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao AY, et al. Global incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of population-based cohort studies. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;1:45–55. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30004-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger Z, et al. Acute pancreatitis in Chile. A multicenter study on epidemiology, etiology and clinical outcome. Retrospective analysis of clinical files. Pancreatology. 2020;20:637–643. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.04.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Párniczky A, et al. Prospective, multicentre, nationwide clinical data from 600 cases of acute pancreatitis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165309. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aranda-Narvaez JM, Gonzalez-Sanchez AJ, Montiel-Casado MC, Titos-Garcia A, Santoyo-Santoyo J. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Surgical indications and technical procedures. World J. Clin. Cases. 2014;2:840–845. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types