Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 12;12(1):7850.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11944-9.

Arginase 1 is a marker of protection against illness in contacts of leprosy patients

Affiliations

Arginase 1 is a marker of protection against illness in contacts of leprosy patients

Rhana Berto da Silva Prata et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Leprosy household contacts are generally more prone to develop the disease compared to the general population. Previous studies have demonstrated that genes related to the alternative activation (M2) profile in macrophages are associated with the increased bacillary load in multibacillary leprosy patients (MB), and that contacts of MB patients have a higher risk of contracting the disease. In addition, positive serological responses to PGL-1 or LID-1 are associated with a higher risk of disease. We performed a 5-year follow-up of contacts of leprosy patients and evaluated the pattern of gene and protein expression in cells from contacts that developed leprosy during this period. Leprosy household contacts had decreased soluble CD163 and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) serum levels when compared with healthy donors and leprosy patients. In contrast, arginase 1 activities were higher in contacts when compared with both healthy donors and leprosy patients. Of the contacts, 33 developed leprosy during the follow-up. Gene expression analysis revealed reduced ARG1 expression in these contacts when compared with contacts that did not develop disease. Arginase activity was a good predictive marker of protection in contacts (sensitivity: 90.0%, specificity: 96.77%) and the association with serology for anti-PGL-1 and anti-LID-1 increased the sensitivity to 100%. Altogether, the data presented here demonstrate a positive role of arginase against leprosy and suggest that the evaluation of arginase activity should be incorporated into leprosy control programs in order to aid in the decision of which contacts should receive chemoprophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contacts of leprosy patients present higher arginase activity than healthy controls and patients. Serum from healthy donors of endemic areas (HD, n = 18), paucibacillary patients (PB, n = 42), multibacillary patients (MB, n = 59), household contacts of PB patients (HC-PB, n = 58), and household contacts of MB patients (HC-MB, n = 83) were collected and levels of soluble (A) CD163 and (B) HO-1 were evaluated by ELISA. In addition, (C) arginase activity was evaluated. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Arginase activity is associated with protection against leprosy in contacts. Whole blood cells and serum from 141 contacts were evaluated. Of these contacts, 33 developed leprosy during the follow-up (HC-DD). HC-NDD, household contacts that did not develop disease. (A) HMOX1 expression, (B) HO-1 levels in sera, (C) ARG1 expression and, (D) arginase activity. *p ≤ 0.05, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evaluation of HO-1 and Arginase as predictive markers of illness in leprosy contacts. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for contacts showing the two markers tested (HO-1, red and Arginase, blue).

References

    1. Palit A, Kar HK. Prevention of transmission of leprosy: the current scenario. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2020;86:115–123. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_326_19. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer E, Vlas DS, Meima A, Habbema D, Richardus J. Different mechanisms for heterogeneity in leprosy susceptibility can explain disease clustering within households. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e14061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Global leprosy (hansen disease) update, 2019: time to step-up prevention initiative. Wkly Epidemiol Rep. 2020;95:417–440.
    1. Schoenmakers A, Hambridge T, Van Wijk R, Kasang C, Richardus JH, Bobosha K, et al. PEP4LEP study protocol: Integrated skin screening and SDR-PEP administration for leprosy prevention: Comparing the effectiveness and feasibility of a community-based intervention to a health centre-based intervention in Ethiopia, Mozambique and Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e046125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarno EN, Duppre NC, Sales AM, Hacker MA, Nery JA, de Matos HJ. Leprosy exposure, infection and disease: a 25-year surveillance study of leprosy patient contacts. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(8):1054–1059. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762012000800015. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types