Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;39(8):1669-1680.
doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03288-w. Epub 2022 May 12.

Review: Role of Model-Informed Drug Development Approaches in the Lifecycle of Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making

Affiliations
Review

Review: Role of Model-Informed Drug Development Approaches in the Lifecycle of Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making

Rajanikanth Madabushi et al. Pharm Res. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) is a powerful approach to support drug development and regulatory review. There is a rich history of MIDD applications at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MIDD applications span across the life cycle of the development of new drugs, generics, and biologic products. In new drug development, MIDD approaches are often applied to inform clinical trial design including dose selection/optimization, aid in the evaluation of critical regulatory review questions such as evidence of effectiveness, and development of policy. In the biopharmaceutics space, we see a trend for increasing role of computational modeling to inform formulation development and help strategize future in vivo studies or lifecycle plans in the post approval setting. As more information and knowledge becomes available pre-approval, quantitative mathematical models are becoming indispensable in supporting generic drug development and approval including complex generic drug products and are expected to help reduce overall time and cost. While the application of MIDD to inform the development of cell and gene therapy products is at an early stage, the potential for future application of MIDD include understanding and quantitative evaluation of information related to biological activity/pharmacodynamics, cell expansion/persistence, transgene expression, immune response, safety, and efficacy. With exciting innovations on the horizon, broader adoption of MIDD is poised to revolutionize drug development for greater patient and societal benefit.

Keywords: biopharmaceutics; gene therapy; generic drugs; model-informed drug development; new drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evolution of MIDD at the FDA. A brief summary of key highlights for every decade with future aspirations are provided. Abbreviations: ICIVC – in vitro-in vivo correlation; PK/PD – pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics; popPK – population pharmacokinetics; D/R – dose-response; E/R – exposure-response; CTS – clinical trial simulations; EOP2A – end of phase 2A; PBPK – physiologically based pharmacokinetics; DDI – drug-drug interactions; DDT – drug development tools; MIDD – model-informed drug development; QCP – quantitative clinical pharmacology; PBBM – physiologically based biopharmaceutics models; RWD/RWE – real world data/real world evidence; RTRT – real time release test; MIE – model-integrated evidence; PDUFA - Prescription Drug User Fee Act.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between clinical trials and relevant in vitro tests illustrating the concept of nested surrogacy. Abbreviations: S&E – safety and efficacy; PK – pharmacokinetics; PK/PD – pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Commonly used MIDD toolsets in generic drug development. Abbreviations: BE – bioequivalence; PK – pharmacokinetics; PBPK – physiologically based pharmacokinetics; ANDA – abbreviated new drug application.

References

    1. Wouters OJ, McKee M, Luyten J. Estimated Research and Development investment needed to bring a new medicine to market, 2009-2018. JAMA. 2020;323(9):844–853. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown DG, Wobst HJ, Kapoor A, Kenna LA, Southall N. Clinical development times for innovative drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021. 10.1038/d41573-021-00190-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. PDUFA reauthorization performance goals and procedures for fiscal years 2018 through 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/99140/download, Accessed 12/11/2021.
    1. Dose-Response information to support drug registration - Guidance for industry (1996). https://www.fda.gov/media/71279/download, Accessed 12/10/2021.
    1. Sun H, Fadiran EO, Jones CD, Lesko L, Huang SM, Higgins K, Hu C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics. A regulatory perspective Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37(1):41–58. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937010-00003. - DOI - PubMed