Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;92(9):2185-2191.
doi: 10.1111/ans.17757. Epub 2022 May 12.

Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety

Naradha Lokuhetty  1 , José Tomás Larach  2   3 , Amrish K S Rajkomar  4 , Helen Mohan  2 , Peadar S Waters  2 , Alexander G Heriot  2   4 , Satish K Warrier  1   2   4   5   6
Affiliations

Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety

Naradha Lokuhetty et al. ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Global differences exist in managing lateral pelvic nodes in rectal cancer. Recent studies demonstrate improved local recurrence rates in patients undergoing lateral pelvic lymph node dissections (LPND) in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer. This study aims to report on the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach in patients undergoing pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Methods: Patients who underwent an elective robotic pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for locally advanced rectal cancer with suspicious lateral lymph nodes or pelvic side wall involvement between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were recorded and analysed.

Results: Eight patients (3 males) with a mean age of 55 (33-73) years and mean body mass index of 26.3 (20.7-30.0) kg/m2 were included. The median operative time and blood loss were 458.75 (360-540) min and 143.75 (100-300) mL, respectively. There were no conversions or intra-operative complications. There were three post-operative complications recorded (two ileus and one anastomotic leak which required an endoscopic washout in theatre and intravenous antibiotics thereafter). Median length of stay was 12.75 (7-23) days. All patients had an R0 resection, and the median lateral pelvic lymph node yield was 9.1 (6-14).

Conclusion: This series demonstrates the practicality and the safety of the robotic approach in the introduction of this technique for en-bloc resection or LPND in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Keywords: lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; pelvic sidewall; rectal cancer; robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993; 341: 457-60.
    1. Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2005; 92: 756-63.
    1. Atef Y, Koedam TW, van Oostendorp SE, Bonjer HJ, Wijsmuller AR, Tuynman JB. Lateral pelvic lymph node metastases in rectal cancer: a systematic review. World J. Surg. 2019; 43: 3198-206.
    1. Otero de Pablos J, Mayol J. Controversies in the management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in patients with advanced rectal cancer: east or west? Front Surg [Internet]. 2020; 6: 79 [Cited 6 Mar 2021.] https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00079/full.
    1. Fujita S, Yamamoto S, Akasu T, Moriya Y. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2003; 90: 1580-5.

LinkOut - more resources